The Relevance of the Concept of Class to the Study of Modern Greek Society

  • Nicos P. Mouzelis


In the light of the general theoretical debate on the nature of capitalist underdevelopment discussed in the previous chapter, here I will try to narrow the focus of analysis and examine the sociological literature on modern Greece — more specifically, the way in which the concept of class is used in the study of Greek development/underdevelopment. Within this limited perspective, there will be no attempt to provide an exhaustive or even systematic account of all sociological writings on modern Greece; neither shall I try to give an overall view of various Marxist and non-Marxist theories of class and the complicated problems they engender.1 Rather, the emphasis will be on the underlying conceptual frameworks, paradigms or metatheories2 that are discernible in representative studies of the Greek social structure and its development. In identifying and comparing such conceptual frameworks, their sociological adequacy and utility for the future development of Greek sociology will be assessed. Finally, although a study of the sociology of Greek sociology could be extremely useful, this paper does not attempt to do this — i.e. to find out how and why a certain sociological paradigm has been widely accepted by most Greek sociologists; the only goal it has set itself is to point out the limitations of the dominant paradigm and the need for an alternative or rather a complementary one.


Collective Actor Class Analysis Social Stratum Capitalist Mode Greek Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 7.
    N. Smelser, Social change in the Industrial Revolution,1770–1840, 2 vols, Routledge, London 1960.Google Scholar
  2. C. Tsoukalas, Dépendance et réproduction: le rôle de l’appareil scolaire dans une formation trans-territoriale, Université de Paris I (Sorbonne), unpub. thesis 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 20.
    G. E. Kourvetaris, ‘Professional self-images and political perspectives in the Greek military’, American Sociological Review 36, 1971, pp. 1043–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 21.
    K. P. Legg, Politics in modern Greece, Part III, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Cal. 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 26.
    A. A. Pepelasis, ‘Agriculture in a restrictive environment: the case of Greece’, Economic Geography 36, 1960, pp. 145–57;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Kordatos, The social significance of the 1821 revolution (in Greek), Epikairotita, Athens 1972.Google Scholar
  7. 39.
    N. Psiroukis, Fascism and the 4th of August (in Greek), Athens 1974.Google Scholar
  8. 48.
    C. Furtado, ‘Sous-développement et dépendance’, Temps Modernes, Oct 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 55.
    D. Lerner, The passing of traditional society, Macmillan, London 1964.Google Scholar
  10. 63.
    An exception to this is M. J. Lineton, Mina: present and past. Depopulation in a village in Mani, unpub. thesis, University of Kent 1971.Google Scholar
  11. 72.
    Cf. B. Moore, op. cit.; and R. Bendix, Work and authority in industry, Wiley, New York 1956;Google Scholar
  12. and E. Wallerstein, The modern world system: capitalist agriculture in 16th-century Europe, New York 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 73.
    I have in mind those of C. Moskof, V. Filias, C. Vergopoulos, C. Tsoukalas, op. cit., and A. Elefantis, The promise of the impossible revolution: the Greek Communist party in the inter-war period (in Greek), Athens, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. 74.
    Cf. for instance G. Bachelard, La formation de l’esprit scientifique, Paris 1967;Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nicos P. Mouzelis 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicos P. Mouzelis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations