A Sort of Battlefield

  • John Prest


All over the country contemporaries were glad to find that, after the initial registration in 1832, ‘the work of the two following years was performed with tolerable facility and expedition. … It was pretty generally pronounced that the registration clauses of the reform act worked well upon the whole, and that both the expense and the inconvenience of the revision would proceed for some years in a diminishing ratio.’1 The number of days occupied by the revising banisters in England and Wales fell from 3662 in 1832 to 2632 in 1833 and 2585 in 1834, and the cost to the Treasury decreased from £30,400 in 1832 to £22,520 in 1834.2


Scene Change Town Council Municipal Corporation Actual Possession River Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 5.
    Sir William Follett, Surrey Standard, 24 Oct 1835.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    N. Gash, Sir Robert Peel (1972) p. 101.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    John Prest, Lord John Russell (1972) p. 86.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    J. K. Buckley, Joseph Parkes of Birmingham (1926) p. 129.Google Scholar
  5. 32.
    G. P. Elliott, A Practical Treatise on the Qualifications and Registration of Parliamentary Electors (1839) p. 76.Google Scholar
  6. 61.
    J. D. Chambers The New Bills for the Registration of Electors Critically Examined (1836) p. 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Prest 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Prest
    • 1
  1. 1.OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations