• Ian McAllister


Recent studies of political elites have done much to uncover information about how political groups, communities and political systems function. Numerous arguments have been employed to justify elite analysis and particularly those aspects of it which concentrate on the social composition of the elite and the patterns by which members are recruited into it. In examining the elite of an elective institution, the main justifications are four-fold. Firstly, knowledge of how a society ‘selects’ a particular set of persons who hold common social attributes can tell us much about the values and biases of that society. Conversely, the manner in which a political party states a preference for a certain type of candidate for elective office can convey similar conclusions about that party. Thirdly, if the study is extended over time, change in the collective characteristics of an elite can reflect change within the social structure of the society. Fourthly, if the study is placed in a comparative context, inferences may be drawn about the relationship between the party’s organisational structure and that of the social system.


Political Party Political Elite Political Group Labour Party Political Opportunity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    For separate studies, see Patrick McGill, ‘The Senate in Northern Ireland, 1921 –62’ (Belfast: unpublished Queen’s University PhD thesis, 1965) and Richard Rose, Northern Ireland: a Time of Choice, (London: Macmillan, 1976) pp. 111 –16.Google Scholar
  2. Richard Rose, Northern Ireland: a Time of Choice, (London: Macmillan, 1976) pp. 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    David Butler and Donald Stokes, Political Change in Britain, (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) p. 327.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Brian Farrell, ‘Dáil Deputies: “the 1969 Generation” ’, Economic and Social Review, 2:3 (1971) p. 315.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Richard Rose, Class and Party Divisions: Britain as a Test Case, (Glasgow: Survey Research Centre Occasional Paper No. 1, 1969) Table 12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edmund A. Aunger, ‘Religion and Occupational Class in Northern Ireland’, Economic and Social Review, 7:1 (1975) p. 6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See, for example, Mart Bax, ‘Patronage Irish Style: Irish Politicians as Brokers’, Sociologische Gids, 17:3 (1970) pp. 179–91.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert E. Agger, ‘Lawyers in Politics: the Starting Point for a New Research Program’, Temple Law Quarterly, 29:3 (1956) p. 436.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    See, for example, Basil Chubb, ‘Going About Persecuting Civil Servants: the Role of the Irish Parliamentary Representative’, Political Studies, 11:3 (1963) pp. 272–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paul Sacks, ‘Bailiwicks, Locality and Religion: Three Elements in a Dáil Constituency Election’, Economic and Social Review, 1:4 (1970) pp. 531–54.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quoted in Thomas N. Brown, ‘Nationalism and the Irish Peasant, 1800–48’, Review of Politics, 15:4 (1953) p. 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    See Mart Bax, Harpstrings and Confessions: an Anthropological Study of Politics in Rural Ireland, (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 1973) p. 261.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    William H. Riker, The Theory of Political Coalitions, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962) pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samuel J. Eldersveld, Political Parties, (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964) p. 71.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Herbert Jacob, ‘Initial Recruitment of Elected Officials in the United States: a Model’, Journal of Politics, 24:4 (1962) p. 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    Al Cohan, The Irish Political Elite, (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1972) p. 40.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    John Whyte, Dáil Deputies, (Dublin: Tuairim pamphlet no. 15, 1966) p. 36.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    W. J. M. Mackenzie, ‘Local Government in Parliament’ Public Administration, 32:4 (1954) pp. 409–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ian McAllister 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian McAllister

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations