The Effect of Mixture Preparation on Fuel Economy

  • G. A. Harrow


The quality of the fuel—air mixture supplied to a gasoline engine affects its fuel economy in many ways, some of which are subtle and are not fully understood.


Fuel Economy Gasoline Engine Mixture Distribution Lean Mixture Fuel Injection System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. P. Skripkin, V. I. Vorobev and P. G. Romanchikov. The influence of the distribution of the vapour and liquid component of the fuel mixture stream on the non-uniformity of mixture components in the engine cylinder. Automob. Prom. (March 1974) 12 Also Motor Ind. Res. Assoc. Transi., No. 74-7-190 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Borrmeister, F. Drechsler and V. Nghia. Current problems of mixture distribution in four-stroke petrol engines. Tech. Univ. Dresden, Kraftfahrzeug-Tech. (December 1974) 364 Also Motor Ind. Res. Assoc. Transi. No. 30/75 (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. F. Gibson. Carburation. Proc. Inst. Automob. Eng., London 30 (1935–6) 367Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Taub. Carburation. Proc. Inst. Automob. Eng., London 32 (1937–8) 573Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. M. Zucrow. Fuel mixture distribution. Soc. Automot. Eng. Trans., 24 (1929) 162Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. T. C. Yu. Fuel distribution studies — a new look at an old problem. Soc. Automot. Eng. Trans., 71 (1963) 596Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. E. Cooper, R. L. Courtney and C. A. Hall. Radioactive tracers cast new light on fuel distribution. Soc. Automot. Eng. Trans., 67 (1959) 619Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. H. Collins. A technique to characterize quantitatively the air—fuel mixture in the inlet manifold of a gasoline engine. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 690515 (1969)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Eltinge. Determining fuel/air ratio and distribution from exhaust gas composition. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 680114 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. D. Mills and G. A. Harrow. A dielectric cell technique for the continuous measurement of fuel/air ratio under transient conditions of engine operation. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 710162 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Lindsay, A. Thomas and J. L. Wilson. Mixture quality, gasoline vaporization and the Vapipe. Paper presented at Inst. Mech. Eng. Conf. on Power Plants and Future Fuels, January 1975 No. C35/75Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. D. Bond. Quick heat manifolds for reducing cold-engine emission. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 720935 (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. C. Mock. Design of inlet manifolds for heavy fuels. Soc. Automot. Eng. Trans., 15 (1920) 983Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. S. Clark. Initiation and some controlling parameters of combustion in the piston engine. Inst. Mech. Eng., Proc. Automob. Div. 5 (1960–1) 165Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. A. Hoffman. Automobiles today and tomorrow. Rand Corp. Rep., No. RM 2922 (November 1962)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. H. Lewis. An engine service analyser for the study of engine usage in road vehicles. To be publishedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. J. Brogan. Alternative powerplants. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 730519 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. Also in Soc. Automot. Eng. Spec. Publ. No. SP-383 (1973)Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    T. Date, S. Yagi, A. Ishizuya and I. Fuji. Research and development of the Honda CVCC engine. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 740605 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    A. G. Urlaub and F. C. Chmela. High-speed multi-fuel engine L9204 FMV. Soc. Automot Eng. Pap., No. 740122 (1974)Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    E. E. Fawkes. The mixture requirements of an internal combustion engine at various speeds and loads. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1941)Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    J. A. Robison and W. M. Brehob. The influence of improved mixture quality on engine exhaust emissions and performance. Paper presented at Western States Combustion Inst. Meet., October 1965 No. WSCI 65–17Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    J. H. Jones and J. C. Gagliardi. Vehicle exhaust emissions, experiments using a pre-mixed and pre-heated air-fuel charge. Soc. Automot. Eng. Prepr., No. 670485 (1967)Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    A. E. Dodd and J. W. Wisdom. Effect of mixture quality on exhaust emissions from single-cylinder engines. Inst. Mech. Eng., Proc. Automob. Div. 183 (1968–9) 3EGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    R. Lindsay, A. Thomas, J. A. Woodworth and E. G. Zeschmann. An investigation of the influence of homogeneous charge on the exhaust emissions of hydrocarbons, CO and NO from an engine using a continuously generated mixture of gasoline and air. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 710588 (1971)Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    R. Lindsay and J. L. Wilson. Heat pipe vaporization of gasoline — Vapipe. Paper presented at Committee for the Challenges of Modern Society Conf., Ann Arbor, Michigan, October 1973Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    T. Baumeister and L. S. Marks. Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, 7th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    T. W. Ryan, S. S. Lestz and W. E. Meyer. Extension of the lean misfire limit and reduction of exhaust emissions of a spark ignition engine by modification of the ignition and intake system. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 740105 (1974)Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    P. H. Schweitzer. Towards an economical low-pollution automobile. Fed. Int. Soc. Ing. Tech. Automob. Pap., No. B-1-7 (1974)Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    D. A. Hirschler and F. J. Marsee. Meeting future automobile emission standards. Paper presented atNatl. Pet. Refin. Assoc. Conf., San Antonio, 6–7 April 1970 No. AM 70-5Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    Earl Batholomew. Potentialities of emission reduction by design of induction system. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 660109 (1966)Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    L. Eltinge, F. J. Marsee and A. J. Warren. Potentialities of further emission reduction by engine modification. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 680123 (1968)Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    D. R. Liimatta, R. F. Hart, R. W. Deller and W. L. Hull. Effects of mixture distribution on exhaust emissions as indicated by engine data and the hydraulic analogy. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 710618 (1971)Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    US Environmental Protection Agency Consultants. Natl. Res. Counc., Environ. Prot. Agency Rep. on Emissions Control of Engine Syst. presented at Comm. on Motor Vehicle Emissions Commission on Sociotech. Syst., September 1974Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Ford Motor Company. Presentation at US EPA Comm. on Motor Vehicle Emissions, Panel of Consultants on Engine Systems, 16 May 1974Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    W. R. Brandstetter and M. J. Carr. Measurement of air distribution in a multi-cylinder engine by means of a mass flow probe. Soc. Automot. Eng. Pap., No. 730494 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. R. Blackmore and A. Thomas 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Harrow

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations