Mileage Marathons

  • W. S. Affleck
  • G. B. Toft


It must be accepted that the motor car is not an outstandingly efficient device for converting chemical energy into useful mechanical work. The question of why efficiencies are characteristically so low can be discussed at many levels, but at a strictly practical level it reduces to how far could a motor car go on a quantity of fuel if some or most of the constraints on its construction and use were removed. This question forms the basis of the mileage marathons which have been run at the Shell laboratories for a number of years.


Compression Ratio Engine Speed Fuel Economy Aerodynamic Drag Rolling Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. J. Greenshields. 150 miles per gallon is possible. Soc. Automot. Eng. J., 58 (March 1950) 34Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. C. Carlson and H. D. Millay. Mileage marathon from 50 to 244 mpg. Paper presented at Soc. Automot. Eng. St. Louis Sect. Meet., December 1969 No. 700532Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. L. Berry. Nine ways to get better fuel mileage. Paper presented at Soc. Automot. Eng. West Coast Meet., Anaheim, Calif., August 1974 No. 740620Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mike McCarthy. Preposterous petrol parers. Motor (22 November 1975) 36–9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. B. Crum and R. G. McNall. Effects of tire rolling resistance on vehicle fuel economy. Tire Sci. Technol., 3, No. 1 (February 1975) 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sir Harry Ricardo and J. G. G. Hempson. The High-speed Internal Combustion Engine, 5th edn, Blackie, London and Glasgow (1968), 130–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. R. Blackmore and A. Thomas 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. S. Affleck
  • G. B. Toft

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations