Skip to main content

The European Community and National Subsidy Policies

  • Chapter
International Trade and Industrial Policies
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

The American position in the current round of trade negotiations for revising GATT Articles VI and XVI includes a proposal for a tripartite differentiation of national subsidies.1 This so-called ‘traffic light’ or ‘red, green, amber’ system is in many respects quite close to existing European Community (EEC) practices. Since the EEC represents the most far-reaching attempt to liberalize trade among industrialized states, its experience with subsidies, albeit a highly specialized issue, may not only provide useful insights for understanding the American proposal, but also be relevant to efforts to reform the pertinent GATT articles. These include such questions as the extent to which and under what conditions general rules and obligations can be defined which are economically relevant, politically acceptable and enforceable multilaterally among a group of industrialized states; the frame of reference a multilateral organization can develop for evaluating national subsidies; the pressures it can bring to bear on its members; and the limits imposed on policy formulation. In the EEC’s case one limit is a result of the fact that the Community constitutes a suboptimal area from the perspective of the international economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For an early authoritative statement see Hans von der Groeben, ‘Policy on Competition in the European Community’, in Bulletin of the European Community (Brussels: Nos. 7–8, 1961 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hans von der Groeben, Handbuch für Europäische Wirtschaft (Baden-Baden: Lutzeyer, 1975, 132 Lieferung), p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Commission of the European Community, First Report on Competition Policy ( Brussels: April, 1972 ), pp. 112–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See P. S. R. F. Mathijsen, A Guide to European Community Law ( London: Street and Maxwell, 1975 ), p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Commission of the European Community, Third Report on Competition policy ( Brussels: May, 1974 ), pp. 76–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Commission of the European Community, Third Report on Competition Policy ( Brussels: May, 1974 ), pp. 96–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Commission of the European Community, Second Report on Competition Policy (Brussels: April, 1975 ), pp. 106–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Middleton, Negotiating on Non-Tariff Distortions of the Trade: The EFTA Precedents ( London: Macmillan, 1975 ), p. 160.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1978 Steven J. Warnecke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warnecke, S.J. (1978). The European Community and National Subsidy Policies. In: Warnecke, S.J. (eds) International Trade and Industrial Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03412-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics