Skip to main content
  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

The US Administration did not feel that the Minuteman force was immediately endangered by the Soviet build-up. Indeed so long as destruction of the Soviet Union could be ‘assured’ in the aftermath of a surprise first strike it saw no serious threat in terms of any criteria it recognised as being strategically relevant. The Administration did however recognise the threat posed by the build-up to the mobilisation of political support within the US for its strategic policies. McNamara’s policy of restraint, with offensive forces frozen at current levels and ABM deployment forsworn, was put under severe strain by a major Soviet surge in both these areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Morton Halperin, ‘The Decision to Deploy the ABM’, World Politics xxv (Oct 1972) p. 69; Newhouse, Cold Dawn p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Trainor, ‘DOD Says AICBM is Feasible’, Missiles and Rockets, 24 Dec 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Lawrence David Freedman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freedman, L. (1977). The Sentinel Decision. In: US Intelligence and the Soviet Strategic Threat. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03397-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics