The term the ‘Soviet Threat’ is rather presumptuous, assuming as it does an adversary relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States, and implying that this is based on the former’s aggressive nature. The use of the term in this study indicates no ‘blame’ for the start of the cold war, no view about its continuation and no implication as to the effectiveness of détente. It is to be understood in a limited form, mainly as a reference point for US military planning in the field of strategic arms. The Soviet strategic threat represents the dangers to US national security identified as being present or evolving in the nuclear weapons programmes of the Soviet Union.
KeywordsIntelligence Community Threat Assessment Threat Perception Mental Construct Defence Budget
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Robert S. McNamara, ‘The Dynamics of Nuclear Strategy’, speech of i 8 Sep 1967, reprinted in The Department of State Bulletin, lvii (9 Oct 1967) p. 446.Google Scholar
- 2.Alain C. Enthoven and K. Wayne Smith, How Much is Enough? Shaping the Defense Program 1961–1969 (New York: Harper & Row, 1971) p. 179.Google Scholar
- 3.George Rathjens, The Future of the Strategic Arms Race; Options for the 1970’s (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1969) p. 24.Google Scholar
- 9.Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963) pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
- 10.J. David Singer, Deterrence, Arms Control and Disarmament: Towards a Synthesis in National Security Policy (Ohio State University Press, 1962) p. 172.Google Scholar
- 11.Ronald L. Tammen, MIRV and the Arms Race: An Interpretation of Defense Strategy (New York: Praeger, 1973) p. 14.Google Scholar
- 12.Colin S. Gray, ‘The Arms Race Phenomenon’, World Politics xxiv (October 1971) p. 74.Google Scholar