Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Edinburgh Studies in Sociology ((ESIS))

Abstract

The preceding chapter has demonstrated significant and patterned differences in the cognition of occupations. Different sub-groups of people cluster jobs together in different ways. We now turn to occupational evaluation. Are there similarly patterned differences in the invidious and odious comparisons that people make between occupations? In a sense, this question is unnecessary. Evaluation must depend upon cognition, since it is logically impossible to make orderings without some prior notion about the nature of what is being ordered. It follows that the existence of differences in cognition necessarily implies that there will be consequent differences in evaluation (though it is of course possible that the sociologist may choose techniques of data analysis that are insufficiently sensitive to detect these differences).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Anthony P.M. Coxon and Charles L. Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coxon, A.P.M., Jones, C.L. (1978). Occupational Evaluation. In: The Images of Occupational Prestige. Edinburgh Studies in Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03345-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics