Advertisement

Non-Competitive Elections in Europe

  • Juan J. Linz

Abstract

For those who assume that elections are an opportunity for the citizen to express freely his preference for alternative leadership and programmes, the question tends to be, ‘Why elections at all when the rulers are unlikely to give up their power whatever the outcome?’1 Our assumption here is that if there are elections they must have some functions from the point of view of the leadership of the country, and some consequences for the political system, and the voters mut have some reason to participate in them. Any adequate analysis of elections would have to answer the following list of questions.
  1. (1)

    What functions do those elections have from the point of view of the rulers, both explicitly in their statements and implicitly in their minds?

     
  2. (2)

    What consequences do such elections actually have for the political system, whether intended or unintended, functional or dysfunctional?

     
  3. (3)

    What motivates voters to participate in non-competitive and semicompetitive elections and plebiscites? Their motivations may or may not be in accord with the reasons why the rulers require their participation.

     
  4. (4)

    What consequences does participation have for voters independently of their intent?

     
  5. (5)

    What is the significance of the electoral process for the candidates in non-competitive and semi-competitive elections?

     

Keywords

Authoritarian Regime Electoral Process Party System Ruling Group Opposition Parti 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Karl Dietrich Bracher, Wolfgang Sauer and Gerhard Schulz, Die nationalsozialistische Machtergreifung (Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    Edward N. Peterson, The Limits of Hitler’s Power (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    See, for example, Sandor Brunauer, Communist Use of the Franchise in Hungary (New York: Mid-European Studies Center, 1954)Google Scholar
  4. 13.
    J. L. Talmon, The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy (New York: Praeger, 1961).Google Scholar
  5. 15.
    James R. Townsend, Political Participation in Communist China (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1972)Google Scholar
  6. Richard R. Fagen, The Transformation of Political Culture in Cuba (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    But see Hermann-Otto Leng, Die allgemeine Wahl im bolschewistischen Staat. Theorie — Praxis — Genesis (Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain, 1973).Google Scholar
  8. Max E. Mote, Soviet Local and Republic Elections: A description of the 1963 Elections in Leningrad Based on Official Documents, Press Accounts, and Private Interviews (Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution, 1965).Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    See Charles L. Taylor and Michael C. Heidean, World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972) pp. 54–8.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    Carl Schmitt, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus (Berlin: Duncker Humblot, 1926; repr. 1969) p. 22.Google Scholar
  11. 24.
    Georg Simmel, ‘Superordination and Subordination’, in The Sociology of Georg Simmel, trans. and ed. Kurt H. Wolff (Glencoe, NY: Free Press, 1950) pp. 242–4.Google Scholar
  12. 27.
    Zbigniew Pelczynski, ‘Poland 1957’, in Elections Abroad, ed. D. E. Butler (London: Macmillan, 1959) pp. 119 –79.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    Susan Beth Kaufman, ‘Decision-making in an authoritarian regime: the politics of profit-sharing in Mexico’, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    See Juan J. Linz, ‘Some Notes Toward a Comparative Study of Fascism in Sociological and Historical Perspective’, in A Readers’ Guide to Fascism, ed. Walter Laqueur (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1976) pp. 3–121,Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    See Bela Vago, The Shadow of the Swastika. The Rise of Fascism and Anti-Semitism in the Danube Basin, 1936–1939 (Farnborough, Hants: Saxon House, 1975)Google Scholar
  16. 31.
    Jozo Tomasevich, Peasants, Politics and Economic Change in Yugoslavia (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1955) pp. 240–7.Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    See J. J. Linz, ‘Opposition in and under an Authoritarian Regime: the Case of Spain’, in Regimes and Oppositions, ed. Robert A. Dahl (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973) pp. 171–259.Google Scholar
  18. 36.
    See Philippe C. Schmitter, Corporatism and Public Policy in Authoritarian Portugal, Sage Professional Papers, Contemporary Political Sociology Series, no. 06-011 (London, 1975) pp. 24–37Google Scholar
  19. Harry M. Makler, ‘The Portuguese Industrial Elite and its Corporative Relations: A Study of Compartmentalization in an Authoritarian Regime’, in Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. xxiv, no. 3 (Apr 1976) 495–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 37.
    Juan J. Linz and Amando de Miguel, Los Empresarios ante el Poder Publico (Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Politicos, 1966) esp. ch. 6 on formal and informal leadership in the business community.Google Scholar
  21. 38.
    See, for example, Jose Maria Maravall, ‘Students and Politics in Contemporary Spain’, Government and Opposition, xi, no. 2 (Spring 1976) 156–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 40.
    Juan J. Linz, ‘From Falange to Movimiento-Organization: The Spanish Single Party and the Franco Regime, 1936–1968’, in Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society, ed. S. P. Huntington and C. H. Moore (New York: Basic Books, 1970) pp. 128–203.Google Scholar
  23. 44.
    Marcus Faria Figueiredo and Peter McDonough, Towards a Theory of Political Control: Coercion and Cooptation in Brazil, a paper of the Center for Political Studies, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, 1975).Google Scholar
  24. 46.
    Walter F. Weiker, Political Tutelage and Democracy in Turkey. The Free Party and its Aftermath (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1973)Google Scholar
  25. and Kemel H. Karpat, Turkey’s Politics: The Transition to a Multiparty System (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1959)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Juan J. Linz 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan J. Linz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations