There is general critical sorrow over The Trespasser. ‘It need not detain us long’;1 ‘little needs to be said’;2 ‘the less said the better’.3 But although it is perhaps the worst novel Lawrence wrote, it is all the same a remarkably revealing book. It shows us the kind of novelist Lawrence was between 1910 and 1912, and could have gone on being. And we cannot simply dismiss it as youthful or immature. Its composition was curiously intertwined with that of Sons and Lovers—the novel generally thought to mark Lawrence’s maturity as a writer.
KeywordsShort Story Catholic Church Roman Catholic Church Tragic Hero Special Praise
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Graham Hough, The Dark Sun (1956; rpt. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1961), p. 49.Google Scholar
- 2.Kenneth Alldritt, The Visual Imagination of D. H. Lawrence (London: Edward Arnold. 1971), p. 10.Google Scholar
- 3.William York Tindall, D. H. Lawrence and Susan his cow (Columbia: Columbia Univ. Press, 1939), p. 206.Google Scholar
- 4.Helen Corke, ‘The Writing of The Trespasser’, D. H. Lawrence Review, 7 (Fall 1974), 232–3.Google Scholar
- 5.Helen Corke and Malcolm Muggeridge, ‘The Dreaming Woman’, The Listener, 80 (25 July 1968), 104.Google Scholar
- 7.Helen Corke, In Our Infancy (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1975), p. 225.Google Scholar
- 14.H. A. Mason, ‘D. H. Lawrence and The White Peacock’, The Cambridge Quarterly, 7, No. 3 (1977), 225.Google Scholar
- 17.Edward Garnett, Friday Nights (1916; rpt. London: Duckworth, 1932), p. 154.Google Scholar
- 18.D. H. Lawrence, The Mortal Coil and Other Stories (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1971), pp. 104–5.Google Scholar