Advertisement

The conformation of hormonal peptides in solution

  • J. Feeney
Part of the Biological Council book series (BCSDA)

Abstract

For large hormonal peptides such as insulin it seems reasonable to assume that the molecules will have a fairly well-defined three-dimensional structure in solution where the groups are organised, to a large extent, into a conformation suitable for a favourable interaction with its receptor. When one considers much smaller hormonal peptides such as the linear peptides thyrotropin releasing factor (TRF), gastrin tetrapeptide and luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LH — RH) and the cyclic neurohypophysial hormones, oxytocin and lysine vasopressin, it is of interest to ask if these molecules also exist in some strongly preferred conformation in solution. Some workers have argued that the most populated conformation of the hormone will bind with the highest affinity to the receptor, although there is no a priori reason for believing this to be the case. At the present time there are no available data on hormone conformations in hormone — receptor complexes on which to examine these claims. However, the X-ray structures of several enzyme — coenzyme and enzyme — inhibitor complexes indicate that conformational changes often occur on complex formation. If there is a conformational change when the hormonal peptides bind to their receptors, then it will be necessary to define the conformational state for both the free and bound peptides if we are to fully understand the energetics of the hormone — receptor interaction.

Keywords

Hormonal Peptide Fractional Population Molecular Hydrogen Bond Shift Coefficient Pseudocontact Shift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry, C. D., North, A. C. T., Glasel, J. A., Williams, R. J. P. and Xavier, A. V. (1971). Nature (London), 232, 236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birdsall, B., Birdsall, N. J. M., Feeney, J. and Thornton, J. (1975). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 2845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birdsall, B., Feeney, J. and Guiliani, A. M. (1977). In Metal-Ligand Interactions in Organic and Biochemistry (ed. B. Pullman)Google Scholar
  4. Bleich, H. E., Galardy, R. E. and Printz, M. P. (1973). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95, 2041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boicelli, C. A., Bradbury, A. F. and Feeney, J. (1977). J. Chem. Soc. 477.Google Scholar
  6. Bradbury, A. F., Burgen, A. S. V., Feeney, J., Roberts, G. C. K. and Smyth, D. G. (1974). FEBS Lett., 42, 179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewster, A. I. and Hruby, V. J. (1973). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 3806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewster, A. I., Hruby, V. J., Glasel, J. A. and Tonelli, A. E. (1973). Biochemistry, 12, 5294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burgen, A. S. V., Feeney, J. and Roberts, G. C. K..(1975). Nature (London), 253, 753Google Scholar
  10. Burgess, R. W., Momany, F. A. and Scheraga, H. A. (1973). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bystrov, V. F. (1976), In Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Vol. 10 (ed. J. W. Emsley, J. Feeney and L. H. Sutcliffe), Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Deslauriers, R., Levy, G. C., McGregor, W. H., Sarantakis, K. and Smith, I. C. P. (1975). Biochemistry, 14, 4335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deslauriers, R. and Somorjai, R. L. (1976). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 1931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deslauriers, R., Smith, I. C. P. and Walter, R. (1974a). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 2289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deslauriers, R., Walter, R. and Smith, I. C. P. (1972). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 48, 854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deslauriers, R., Walter, R. and Smith, I. C. P. (1974b). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorman, D. E. and Bovey, F. A. (1973) J. Org. Chem., 38, 1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feeney, J. (1975). Proc. R. Soc. London A, 345, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feeney, J. (1976). J. Mag. Res., 21, 473Google Scholar
  20. Feeney, J., Bedford, G. R. and Wessels, P. L. (1974b). FEBS Lett., 42, 347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feeney, J., Roberts, G. C. K., Brown, J. P., Burgen, A. S. V. and Gregory, H. (1972). J. Chem. Soc. II, 601Google Scholar
  22. Feeney, J., Roberts, G. C. K. and Burgen, A. S. V. (1974a). In Molecular and Quantum Pharmacology (ed. E. Bergmann and B. Pullman), Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feeney, J., Roberts, G. C. K., Rockey, J. H. and Burgen, A. S. V. (1971). Nature (London), 232, 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons, W. A., Nemethy, G., Stern, A. and Craig, L. C. (1970). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 67, 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glasel, J. A., Hruby, V. J., McKelvy, J. F. and Spatola, A. F. (1973). J. Mol. Biol., 79, 555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen, P. E., Feeney, J. and Roberts, G. C. K. (1975). J. Mag. Res., 17, 249Google Scholar
  27. Higashijima, T., Tasumi, M. and Miyazawa, T. (1975). FEBS Lett., 57, 175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, L. F., Schwartz, I. L. and Walter, R. (1969). Proc. Nat. Acad. Set U.S.A., 64, 1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kopple, K. D., Go, A., Logan, R. H. and Savoda, J. (1972). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kotelchuck, D., Scheraga, H. A. and Walter, R. (1972). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 69, 3629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levine, B. A. and Williams, R. J. P. (1975). Proc. R. Soc. London A, 345, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nemethy, G. (1975). Biochimie, 57, 471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pachler, K. G. R. (1964). Spectrochim. Acta, 20, 581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott, R. A. and Scheraga, H. A. (1966). J. Chem. Phys., 45, 2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, I. C. P. (1975). Varian Application Note, NMR 75–2Google Scholar
  36. Smith, I. C. P., Deslauriers, R., Saito, H. and Walter, R. (1973). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 222, 597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, I. C. P., Deslauriers, R. and Walter, R. (1972). In Chemistry and Biology of Peptides (ed. J. Meienhofer ), Ann Arbor Sci. Publ. Inc., p. 29Google Scholar
  38. Sogn, J. A., Gibbons, W. A. and Randall, E. W. (1973). Biochemistry, 12, 2100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas, W. A. and Williams, M. K. (1972). Chem. Commun. 994Google Scholar
  40. Tonelli, A. E. and Bovey, F. A. (1970). Macromolecules, 3, 410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Urry, D. W., Ohnishi, M. and Walter, R. (1970). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 66, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Urry, D. W. and Walter, R. (1971). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Von Dreele, P. H., Scheraga, H. A., Dyckes, D. F., Ferger, M. F. and du Vigneaud, V. (1972). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 69, 3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walter, R. (1971). In Structure Activity Relationships of Protein and Polypeptide Hormones (ed. M. Margoulies and F. C. Greenwood), Amsterdam, Excepta Medica, pp. 181–193Google Scholar
  45. Walter, R. and Glickson, J. D. (1973). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walter, R., Prasad, K. U., Deslauriers, R. and Smith, I. C. P. (1973). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wessels, P. L., Feeney, J., Gregory, H. and Gormley, J. J. (1973). J. Chem. Soc. II, 1671Google Scholar
  48. Wüthrich, K., Tun-kyi, A. and Schwyzer, R. (1972). FEBS Lett. 25, 104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Biology Endowment Trust Fund 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Feeney
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Molecular PharmacologyNational Institute for Medical ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations