It is an honour, and a thoroughly unearned pleasure, for me to be asked to comment on papers on trade theory by Gottfried Haberler and Bertil Ohlin. So it is with considerable diffidence that I offer my comments here. The papers by Professor Haberler and Ohlin are surveys of a literature that is at least decades, even centuries, old. A discussant can hardly touch on a majority of the points made in these surveys; rather he has to find a point of departure related to his particular comparative advantage with the hope that he can contribute to the discussion. As I read the two surveys, I decided that my contribution might lie in a discussion of recent empirical work on three-factor ‘explanations’ of the composition of trade in manufactured goods, and in a partial defence of the factor-proportions hypothesis concerning the source of comparative advantage. Here I put the word explanations in quotation marks, and mention a partial defence of the factor-proportions hypothesis because almost all of the recent empirical work has been on the factor content of trade; hardly any has been reported on relative factor endowments.


Human Capital Comparative Advantage Foreign Trade Physical Capital Labour Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    1 The following discussion draws on W. H. Branson and N. Monoyios (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Nobel Foundation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Branson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations