Abstract
In this last chapter I shall be looking first at the most important way in which Wittgenstein and the Mahāyāna are not related, and then at some important ways in which they are. A list of all the ways in which two people or things are unrelated would obviously be endless and largely trivial: only where there might be a temptation to argue for a link is there any point in showing that the link does not really exist. So the only link which I am concerned to show as illusory is one which, if it could be established, would be a philosophical bombshell: the notion, that is, that some of Wittgenstein’s ideas could have been derived, even if indirectly, from the Mahāyāna. Proof of such influence would, of course, invalidate much of what I have written, since I have been assuming that the similarities need to be accounted for in a quite different way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1977 Chris Gudmunsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gudmunsen, C. (1977). Disconnection and Connection. In: Wittgenstein and Buddhism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03128-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03128-3_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03130-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03128-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)