Advertisement

Ethics and Religion

  • Chris Gudmunsen

Abstract

Neither Russell nor Wittgenstein (after the Tractatus) spent much time on philosophical ethics. In this section, therefore, the parallels will be less personal although, I hope, no less valid. For Russell, I shall more or less substitute G. E. Moore, whose ethical theories are closely tied to a referential theory of meaning. And in the Elements of Ethics, Russell adopted Moore’s views that goodness is an indefinable quality which cannot be demonstrated, that one can make mistakes in identifying it, and that a right action is one leading to the most goodness. For Wittgenstein I shall not need to substitute anyone in particular, though I shall be partly concerned, as many moral philosophers have been since, say, the second world war, with the metaethical implications of later Wittgensteinian ideas.

Keywords

Natural Event Objective World Factual Difference Moral Goodness Moral Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Chris Gudmunsen 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Gudmunsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations