The Techniques of International Government
The success of this complex of organizations we have been describing clearly depends ultimately on their ability to secure the co-operation of national governments. The most obvious difference between international and national administration is that international organizations do not dispose of the ultimate sanction of coercive power to secure compliance. International organizations have considerable authority, but no power. National governments may be pledged in a general way to cooperate with such bodies; but they cannot normally be compelled to do so in particular cases. International organizations have therefore had to devise a variety of techniques to induce co-operation.
KeywordsNational Government Majority Vote International Agency Simple Majority Joint Programme
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.E. Yemin, Legislative Powers in the UN and Specialised Agencies (London, 1969), pp. 37–8.Google Scholar
- 6.C. A. Riche, Majority Rule in International Organisation (London, 1931).Google Scholar
- 8.For a general description of this system, see C. A. Landy, The Effectiveness of International Supervision (London, 1966). In some cases, the ILO establishes special procedures and bodies to secure implementation of particular conventions: for example, in the case of the freedom of association conventions.Google Scholar
- Alexandrowicz, C. H. World Economic Agencies: Law and Practice. London, 1962.Google Scholar
- Cox, R. W. and H. K. Jacobson, eds. The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization. London, 1973.Google Scholar
- Yemin, E. Legislative Powers in the UN and Specialised Agencies. London, 1969.Google Scholar