Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Russian and East European History ((SREEHS))

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

To attempt a cost analysis of the new lands is to undertake a task of incredible complexity. Considering the paucity of information available on the subject and the difficulties of interpreting the available Soviet data, no claims are made that the following remarks touch more than the tip of the proverbial iceberg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. T. Morgun, Dumy o tseline, 2nd ed. (Moscow, 1969) p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. I. Baraev (ed.), Osnovnye polozheniya po borbe s vodnoi i vetrouoi eroziei pochv, (Moscow, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. A. Koval, Zernovoe khozyaistvo SSSR, (Moscow, 1965) p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekonomicheskaya Gazeta, 8 Aug 1964. Cf. W. G. Hahn, The Politics of Soviet Agriculture, 1960–1970, (Baltimore and London, 1972) pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. I. Baraev, A. A. Zaitseva, E. F. Gossen, Borba s vetrovoi eroziei pochv, (Alma-Ata, 1963) p. 10. There were also dust storms during the autumn of 1962 which affected Virgin Land krai, West Kazakhstan oblast, and neighbouring oblasti, of the RSFSR.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. I. Baraev, Selskoe Khozyaistvo Kazakhstana, no. 3 (1969) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Konshin (ed.), Ekonomika sovkhozov i kolkhozov tselinnykh raionov, (Moscow-Tselinograd, 1964) p. 239. Unfortunately the author does not indicate what percentage of the total this area represents.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. I. Baraev (ed.), Nekotorye voprosy osvoeniya tselinnykh i zalezhnykh zemel v Kazakhstane, (Alma-Ata, 1954) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. P. Yarkov (ed.), Pochvenno-agronomicheskie issledovaniya na tselinnykh zemlyakh, (Moscow, 1957) pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Preobrazhennaya step, (Alma-Ata, 1967) p. 249. Another writer puts the area surveyed during 1954 and 1955 at 93 million ha and the area designated as fit for cultivation at 20 million ha. I. D. Yakovlev, Vtoraya zhitnitsa strany, (Moscow, 1957) p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. K. Mikhailov, Sovkhoznoe stroitelstvo v Kazakhstane (1946–1970 gg.), (Alma-Ata, 1973) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pravda, 13 Feb 1964; C. Zoerb, ‘The Virgin Land Territory: Plans, Performance, Prospects’, in R. D. Laird and E. L. Crowley (eds.), Soviet Agriculture: The Permanent Crisis, (New York, 1965) p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Warkentin (ed.), Canada: A Geographical Interpretation, (Toronto, 1968) p. 426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Martin McCauley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCauley, M. (1976). The Virgin Lands: The Balance Sheet. In: Khrushchev and the Development of Soviet Agriculture. Studies in Russian and East European History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03059-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics