Skip to main content

From the Fall of Malenkov to the Fall of Khrushchev, 1955–64

  • Chapter
Khrushchev and the Development of Soviet Agriculture

Part of the book series: Studies in Russian and East European History ((SREEHS))

Abstract

The role of the agricultural administration from the mid-1980s until the death of Stalin was often difficult to fulfil but was relatively easy to grasp. Its main task was to exercise close control over the countryside in order to guarantee supplies of food and raw materials vital to the success of the industrialisation drive. Production sometimes suffered, but control was the order of the day. The MTS, the large agricultural bureaucracy, the complicated procurement system, the extreme centralisation of agricultural planning and procurement and the often arbitrary nature of administrative intervention were all geared towards one goal — control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Leo Gruliow (ed.), Current Soviet Policies, (New York, 1956) p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Strauss, Soviet Agriculture in Perspective, (London, 1969) p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Baranov, in VE, no. 8 (1957) pp. 63–71, came out strongly for the use of chemicals to increase yields in agriculture and refuted the argument that fertilisers on large areas sown to cereals were uneconomic.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. D. Laptev, VE, no. 9 (1958) pp. 93–6. This was an account of what he had said at a conference of social scientists in June 1958. N. Anisimov, Kommunist, no. 18 (1959) pp. 10–19, stated that the anti-party group had opposed the virgin land programme on the grounds that it represented extensive agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. D. Laptev, VE, no. 9 (1958) pp. 93–6. This was an account of what he had said at a conference of social scientists in June 1958. N. Anisimov, Kommunist, no. 18 (1959) pp. 10–19, stated that the anti-party group had opposed the virgin land programme on the grounds that it represented extensive agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. F. Mashenkov, Ispolzovanie trudovykh resursov selskoi mestnosti, (Moscow, 1965) p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert S. McNamara, The Essence of Security, (London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Martin McCauley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCauley, M. (1976). From the Fall of Malenkov to the Fall of Khrushchev, 1955–64. In: Khrushchev and the Development of Soviet Agriculture. Studies in Russian and East European History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03059-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics