Lies, Damned Lies, and Strike Statistics: the Measurement of Trends in Industrial Conflict

  • Michael Shalev


Overt and collective conflict between labour and management has been a lasting preoccupation of many people ever since strikes and lock-outs appeared on the industrial scene well over a century ago. From the beginning public authorities took great interest in strikes, and were quick to institute the business of counting and classifying them. The statistics they produced were and still are some of the most over-abused and least understood of man’s many attempts to freeze and condense richly dynamic social events into static, artificial, and misleadingly accurate arithmetic. And from the first, the indignation or self-satisfaction experienced from looking beyond one’s borders and comparing one’s own record with those of other countries has been one of the major attractions of stoppage statistics.


Industrial Relation Stoppage Statistic Relative Involvement Labour Dispute Strike Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

List of Works Cited

  1. Durand, C. (1973), Les Grèves de 1971: Pratiques Revendicatives et Orientations Idéologiques (Groupe de Sociologie du Travail, Université de Paris, V II).Google Scholar
  2. Durand, C. and Harff, Y. (1973), ‘Panorama statistique des grèves’, Sociologie du Travail,15, 4, 356–75.Google Scholar
  3. Hyman, R. (1972), Strikes (London: Fontana/Collins).Google Scholar
  4. Kalbitz, R. (1972), Die Arbeitskämpfe in der BRD —Ausperrung und Streik 1948–68 (Ph.D Dissertation, Bochum University).Google Scholar
  5. Kelsall, E. P. (1958), ‘A theoretical setting for the study and treatment of strikes’, Occupational Psychology,32, 1, I - 20.Google Scholar
  6. Knowles, K. G.J. C. (1952), Strikes — A Study in Industrial Conflict (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  7. Ross, A. M. (1961), ‘The prospects for industrial conflict’, Industrial Relations, 1, 1, 57 — 74.Google Scholar
  8. Ross, A. M. and Hartmann, P. T. (1960), Changing Patterns of Industrial Conflict (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  9. Silver, M. (or Shalev, M.) (1973), ‘Recent British strike trends: a factual analysis’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, xi, 1.Google Scholar
  10. Stearns, P. N. (1974), ‘Measuring the evolution of strike movements’, International Review of Social History, 19, 1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Turner, H. A., Clack, G. and Roberts, G. (1967), Labour Relations in the Motor Industry (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  12. Walker, K. F. (1969), ‘Strategic factors in industrial relations systems’, International Institute of Labour Studies Bulletin, No. 6, 97–209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Shalev

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations