Advertisement

On the Political Economy of Monetary Integration: A Public Economics Approach

  • Koichi Hamada

Abstract

One of the fundamental problems of international monetary relations is how and to what extent national economies should be incorporated into monetary unions. A main concern of the countries belonging to the European Community is the process of their monetary integration. For the world as a whole, the basic question is whether a subset of countries—or all the nations —should unite into a single currency area with fixed exchange rates or each nation should remain as an independent currency area with floating exchange rates.1

Keywords

Exchange Rate Public Good Political Economy Monetary Policy Monetary Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    The most recent include W. M. Corden, Monetary Integration, Essays in International Finance, no. 93, Princeton (1972);Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    and J. C. Ingram, The Case for European Monetary Integration Essays in International Finance, no. 98, Princeton (1973)Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    H. G. Johnson and A. K. Swoboda (eds) The Economics of Common Currencies, Allen & Unwin, London (1973).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    See the concluding remark of L. B. Yeager, International Monetary Mechanism, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    M. Olson Jr, ‘The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and Theory of Groups’, Harvard Economic Studies, vol. 124, Cambridge (1965).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    K. Hamada, ‘Alternative Exchange Rate Systems and the Interdependence of Monetary Policies’, in R. Z. Aliber (ed.) National Monetary Policies and the International Financial System, University of Chicago Press (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Early writers emphasised this benefit of monetary integration. See T. Guggenheim, ‘Some Early Views on Monetary Integration’, in Johnson and Swoboda (eds) The Economics of Common Currencies op. cit.Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    K. Burnner and A. H. Meltzer, ‘The Use of Money: Money in the Theory of an Exchange Economy’, American Economic Review, vol. 61 (1971) pp. 784–805.Google Scholar
  9. 19.
    J. Marcus Fleming, ‘On the Exchange Rate Unification’, Economic Journal, vol. 81 (Sep 1971) pp. 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 20.
    R. I. McKinnon, ‘Optimal Currency Areas’, The American Economic Review (Sep 1963) vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 717–25.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    M. Olson Jr, ‘The Logic of Collective Action’, loc. cit., and also Mancur Olson and Richard Zeckhauser, ’An Economic Theory of Alliances’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 43 (Aug 1966) pp. 266–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 24.
    R. E. Wagner, ‘Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Article’, Papers on Non-Market Decision Making, vol. 1 (1966) pp. 161–70.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    N. Frohlich, J. A. Oppenheimer and O. R. Young, Political Leadership and Collective Goods, Princeton, N. J. (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    Similar approach was taken in H. R. Kramer, ‘Experience with Historical Monetary Unions’, in H. Giersch (ed.) Integration durchWahrungsunion, Institute fur Weltwirtsschaft an der Universitat Kiel, Mohr, Tübingen (1971).Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    G. Stolper, The German Economy: 1870 to the Present (translated by T. Stolper), Harcourt, Brace & World (1967): W. O. Henderson, The Zollverein, Cambridge University Press (1939).Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    S. B. Clough, The Economic History of Modern Italy, Columbia University Press, N.Y. (1964).Google Scholar
  17. 34.
    Y. Sakudo, Kinsei Nihon Kaheishi (Monetary History of Modern Japan), Kobundo, Tokyo (1968).Google Scholar
  18. 35.
    K. Yamaguchi Hansatsu Shi Kenkyu Josetsu ( Towards the History of Local Notes ), Bank of Japan (1966).Google Scholar
  19. 37.
    See, for details, H. P. Willis, A History of the Latin Monetary Union: A Study of International Monetary Action University of Chicago Press (1901): see also Krämer, op. cit., A. Nielsen, ‘Monetary Union’, Encyclopedia of Social Science vol. X, New York (1933).Google Scholar
  20. 47.
    H. G. Johnson, ‘The Monetary Approach to Balance of Payments Theory’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (Mar 1972). The statement in the text assumes the unitary elasticity of the demand for money. But it can be generalised easily to the case of non-unitary elasticity.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koichi Hamada

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations