Skip to main content

Michael Robartes: Two Occult Manuscripts

  • Chapter

Abstract

Few scholars will appreciate the considerable efforts Yeats put into the composition of his two editions of A Vision. While it is proper that emphasis should be placed on the poems and plays, it is also proper that there should be investigation of the origins of A Vision, for it is possible not merely to demonstrate the conscious artistry that went into the making of this philosophical work but also to clarify the gradual development of the occult and philosophical thought which occupied many of Yeats’ s most interesting years and which can usefully gloss the poems and plays written during those years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For information on Yeats’s habits of composition, see Curtis Bradford, Yeats at Work (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965), pp. xi-xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  2. All publication data are from Allan Wade, A Bibliography of the Writings of W. B. Yeats, 3rd. ed., rev. and ed. Russell K. Alspach (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Letters of W. B. Yeats, ed. Allan Wade (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1954), p. 644 (hereafter cited as Letters).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See also S. B. Bushrui, “Yeats’s Arabic Interests”, in In Excited Reverie: A Centenary Tribute to William Butler Yeats: 1865–1939, ed. A. Norman Jeffares and K. G. W. Cross (London: Macmillan, 1965), pp. 296–97.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yeats and F. P. Sturm had an exchange over the Latin in 1926; see Frank Pearce Sturm: His Life, Letters, and Collected Work, ed. Richard Taylor (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1969), pp. 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Ellmann, Yeats: The Man and the Masks (New York: Macmillan, 1948), p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  7. In Yeats’s A Vision: An Explanation of Life Founded upon the Writings of Giraldus and upon Certain Doctrines Attributed to Kusta ben Luka (London: T. Werner Laurie, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helen Hennessy Vendler, Yeats’s Vision and the Later Flays (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A similar editorial policy is stated in Denis Donoghue, ed., W. B. Yeats: Memoirs: Autobiography-First Draft; Journal (London: Macmillan, 1972), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The reference is to Yeats’s Per Arnica Silentia Lunae (1918), [M, 331–32].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hazard Adams published “Michael Robartes Foretells” as an appendix to Blake and Yeats: The Contrary Vision (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1955), pp, 301–05.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For studies of Yeats’s supposed admiration of Fascism, see V. K. Narayana Menon, The Development of William Butler Yeats (London: Oliver and Boyd, 1942), pp. 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. John R. Harrison, The Reactionaries: Yeats, Lewis, Pound, Eliot, Lawrence: A Study of the Anti-Democratic Intelligentsia (New York: Shocken Books, 1967), pp. 39–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy, 4th ed. (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1930), p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  15. In A Vision (1937), p. 206, Yeats speaks of several cultures and says that they, “having attained some Achilles in the first blossoming, find pious Aeneas in their second….”

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yeats’s reference is to Hermann Schneider, The History of World Civilization: From Prehistoric Times to the Middle Ages, tr. Margaret M. Green, 2 vols. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1931).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

George Mills Harper

Copyright information

© 1975 Robert O’Driscoll and Lorna Reynolds

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hood, W.K. (1975). Michael Robartes: Two Occult Manuscripts. In: Harper, G.M. (eds) Yeats and the Occult. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02937-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics