Skip to main content

Hamlet as Observer and Consciousness

  • Chapter
Book cover Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

Why should Shakespeare re-write the tragedy of Brutus and call it The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark? The more we compare the two plays the more likely it seems that he felt dissatisfied with his first mature tragedy, and that he went over the same ground again because he recognised, too late, that he had not made the most of it. Advancing from Brutus to Hamlet he must have pondered many of the fundamental questions of tragedy — not least, I think, the tragic hero’s relations with the audience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Coleridge’s Table Talk (1917 ed.) p. 65

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Hazlitt’s Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays (1895 ed.) P. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. Foakes, ‘ Hamlet and the Court of Elsinore’, Shakespeare Survey, IX (1956) 38. Compare also Granville-Barker, Prefaces, III, 62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Caroline F. E. Spurgeon, Shakespeare’s Imagery (Boston, 1958 ed.) p. 316;

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Wilson Knight, The Wheel of Fire (1960 ed.) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See G. Wilson Knight, ‘The Embassy of Death: an Essay on Hamlet’, first published in 1930, and ‘Hamlet Reconsidered (1947)’. Both essays are in The Wheel of Fire (1960 ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. C. Knights, An Approach to ‘Hamlet’ (Peregrine ed., 1966) pp. 202, 210–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. D. F. Kitto, Form and Meaning in Drama (1956) p. 330; quoted by Knights, An Approach to ‘Hamlet’ p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. S. Lewis, ‘Hamlet: The Prince or the Poem?’, in Studies in Shakespeare, British Academy Lectures, ed. Peter Alexander (1964) p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eleanor Prosser, Hamlet and Revenge (1967) pp. 102, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. In this chapter I am indebted at several points to Nigel Alexander’s Poison, Play and Duel (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Compare also Stephen Booth, ‘On the Value of Hamlet’, in Reinterpretations of Elizabethan Drama, English Institute Essays, ed. N. Rabkin (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 E. A. J. Honigmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Honigmann, E.A.J. (1976). Hamlet as Observer and Consciousness. In: Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02931-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics