Abstract
The facilities and processes that governments provide for resolving legal disputes constitute an important public service. For the resolution of some of these disputes, society turns to a body of laymen—a jury. In considering the fury as a conflict-resolving instrument, several interrelated questions arise concerning the jury’s size, the way its members are selected, and the voting rule that it uses in reaching its decision. This paper presents a theoretical structure to help address these questions. The model, which uses a statistical decision-theoretic framework, is then used to examine the specific issue of how ‘representative’ a jury should be.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beiser, E. N., ‘The Trial Jury: Empirical and Normative Considerations’ (paper delivered at the 1973 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, 4–8 Sep 1973).
Broeder, D. W., ‘The Functions of the Jury: Facts or Fictions?’, University of Chicago Law Review, XXI (1954), p. 386.
Erlanger, H. S., ‘Jury Research in America; Its Past and Future’, Law and Society Review, IV (1970), p. 345.
Finkelstein, M. O., ‘The Application of Statistical Decision Theory to the Jury Discrimination Cases’, Harvard Law Review, LXXX (1966), p. 338.
Finkelstein, M. O., and Fairley, W. B., ‘A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence’, Harvard Law Review, LXXXIII (1970), p. 489.
Finkelstein, M. O., and Fairley, W. B., ‘A Comment on “Trial by Mathematics” ‘, Harvard Law Review, LXXXIV (1971), p. 1801.
Gelfand, A. E., and Solomon, H., ‘A Study of Poisson’s Models for Jury Verdicts in Criminal and Civil Trials’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, LXVIII (1973), p. 271.
Goldstein, A. S., Book Review, Law and Society Review, I (1967), p. 148.
Himelrick, R. G., ‘Federal Courts—Juror Selection—Under-Representation of Young Adults on Juror Source Lists’, Wayne Law Review, XIX (1973), p. 1287.
Johnson, N., and Kotz, S., Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972).
Kalven, H., and Zeisel, H., The American Jury (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown and Co., 1966).
Kessler, J. B., ‘An Empirical Study of Six- and Twelve-Member Jury Decision-Making Processes’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, VI (1973), p. 712.
Martin, D. L., ‘The Economics of Jury Conscription’, Journal of Political Economv, LXXX (1972), p. 680.
Mills, L. R., ‘Six-Member and Twelve-Member Juries: An Empirical Study of Trial Results’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, VI (1973), p. 671.
Posner, R. A., ‘An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration’, Journal of Legal Studies, II (1973), p. 399.
Powell, D. M., ‘Reducing the Size of Juries’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, V (1971), p. 87.
Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis. Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968).
Schulman, J., Shaver, P., Colman, R., Emrich, B., and Christie, R., ‘Recipe for a Jury’, Psychology Today, VI (1973), p. 37.
Sealy, A. P, and Cornish, W. R., ‘Jurors and their Verdicts’, Modern Law Review, XXXVI (1973), p. 496.
Stigler, G. J., ‘Optimum Enforcement of Laws’, Journal of Political Economy, LXXVIII (1970), p. 526.
Tribe, L. H., ‘A Further Critique of Mathematical Proof, Harvard Law Review, LXXXIV (1971), p. 1810.
Tribe, L. H., ‘Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process’, Harvard Law Review, LXXXIV (1971), p. 1329.
Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1947).
Walbert, D. F., ‘The Effect of Jury Size on the Probability of Conviction: An Evaluation of Williams v. Florida’, Case-Western Reserve Law Review, XXII (1971). p. 529.
Wellington, H. H., ‘Common Law Rules and Constitutional Double Standards: Some Notes on Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal LXXXIII (1973), p. 221.
Winter, R. K., Jr. ‘The Jury and the Risk of Nonpersuasion’, Law and Society Review, V (1971), p. 335.
Zeisel, H., ‘… And Then There Were None: The Diminution of the Federal Jury’, University of Chicago Law Review, XXXVIII (1971), p. 710.
Zeisel, H., Six-Man Juries, Majority Verdicts—What Difference Do They Make?, Occasional Papers from the Law School, University of Chicago (1972).
Zeisel, H., ‘The Waning of the American Jury’, American Bar Association Journal, LVIII (1972), p. 367.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1977 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klevorick, A.K. (1977). Jury Size and Composition: An Economic Approach. In: Feldstein, M.S., Inman, R.P. (eds) The Economics of Public Services. International Economic Association Conference Volumes. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02917-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02917-4_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02919-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02917-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)