Abstract
‘Every revolution in poetry is apt to be… a return to common speech’, said Eliot.1 The revolution in twentieth-century poetry with which Eliot was so closely involved was no exception to this generalisation. In fact, one of the most immediately noticeable differences between twentieth-century poetry and most poetry of the nineteenth century is the modern emphasis on common diction. For readers accustomed to the diction of Tennyson — ‘Dost thou look back on what hath been’ (In Memoriam, LXIV) — Eliot’s poetry might have seemed more like prose:
we stopped in the colonnade,
And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten,
And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.
(The Waste Land , 1, 9–11)
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 3
Alexander B. Grosart (ed.), The Complete Poems of John Donne, D.D. (London, 1872 ).
Dante Gabriel Rossetti, His Family Letters: With a Memoir (London, 1895) I, p. 191.
Copyright information
© 1976 Betty S. Flowers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Flowers, B.S. (1976). The Use of Common Speech. In: Browning and the Modern Tradition. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02893-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02893-1_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02895-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02893-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)