Skip to main content
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

‘Every revolution in poetry is apt to be… a return to common speech’, said Eliot.1 The revolution in twentieth-century poetry with which Eliot was so closely involved was no exception to this generalisation. In fact, one of the most immediately noticeable differences between twentieth-century poetry and most poetry of the nineteenth century is the modern emphasis on common diction. For readers accustomed to the diction of Tennyson — ‘Dost thou look back on what hath been’ (In Memoriam, LXIV) — Eliot’s poetry might have seemed more like prose:

we stopped in the colonnade,

And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten,

And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.

(The Waste Land , 1, 9–11)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter 3

  1. Alexander B. Grosart (ed.), The Complete Poems of John Donne, D.D. (London, 1872 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dante Gabriel Rossetti, His Family Letters: With a Memoir (London, 1895) I, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Betty S. Flowers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flowers, B.S. (1976). The Use of Common Speech. In: Browning and the Modern Tradition. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02893-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics