Skip to main content

Need to Rationalise Preferences under Part IV of the GATT

  • Chapter
Tariff Preferences in Mediterranean Diplomacy

Part of the book series: Trade Policy Research Centre

Abstract

The elements of any system of international trade which might have been realised, had the status quo of 1967 been preserved, were discussed in Chapter 3. During the first twenty years of the GATT a rather limited number of discriminatory trade agreements were examined by the contracting parties. The review of these agreements led to the development of rules of procedure and jurisprudence which were flexible and relatively easy to apply.1 In this sense the international trading system of the GATT had been preserved. In elaborating various plans for reforming the General Agreement—the Organisation for Trade Cooperation in 1955 and the new Part IV of the GATT in 1963—the revision of Article XXIV was not even considered.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Peter Bratschi, ‘GATT: Targets for Reform’, The Journal of World Trade Law, July–August 1973, p. 395.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Alfred Tovias and the Trade Policy Research Centre

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tovias, A. (1977). Need to Rationalise Preferences under Part IV of the GATT. In: Tariff Preferences in Mediterranean Diplomacy. Trade Policy Research Centre. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02770-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics