• Dale Kramer


The crucial role that form or structure plays in the novelist’s presentation of life was obvious to Thomas Hardy. His novels are carefully constructed; and the once fashionable observation that his architectural training as a youth was the reason he built neat, geometric plots does not account for the range of experimentation and inventiveness in the forms of his novels. Hardy’s continuing popularity has to do with a combination of seriousness, tenderness, and tolerance that enables him to make significant interpretations of experience. The structural features of his novels are not usually noticed either by general readers or by critics, even though structure is a dominant factor in creating the tragic qualities of the individual novels. My interest is to suggest some of the ways the forms Hardy employed in his great novels contribute to his achievement of tragedy.


Form Alone Theorist Spring Tragic Hero Rhetorical Criticism Tragic Character 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Albert Guerard, Thomas Hardy: The Novels and Stories ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1949 ), p. 157.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Carl J. Weber, Hardy of Wessex: His Life and Literary Career, 2nd ed. ( 1st ed., 1940; New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1965 ), p. 148.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    Joseph Warren Beach, The Technique of Thomas Hardy (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1922), pp. 94, 97.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    See also F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad (1st ed., 1948; London: Chatto & Windus, 1960 ), pp. 22–23;Google Scholar
  5. Frank Chapman, “Hardy the Novelist,” Scrutiny 3 (1934): 22–37;Google Scholar
  6. Arthur Mizener, “The Novel of Doctrine in the Nineteenth Century: Hardy’s Jude the Obscure,” The Sense of Life in the Modern Novel ( Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964 ), pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    Henry Alonzo Myers, Tragedy: A View of Life (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press, 1956).Google Scholar
  8. 25.
    See Dorothea Krook, Elements of Tragedy (New Haven and London: Yale Univ. Press, 1969), pp. 35–65.Google Scholar
  9. see Walter Kaufmann, Tragedy and Philosophy ( New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1969 ).Google Scholar
  10. 27.
    John Paterson, “The Mayor of Casterbridge as Tragedy,” VS 3 (1959): 151–72.Google Scholar
  11. See also Helen Garwood, Thomas Hardy: An Illustration of the Philosophy of Schopenhauer ( Phila- delphia: John C. Winston, 1911 ), pp. 41–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48202 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale Kramer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisUSA

Personalised recommendations