Cinematographic analysis of the intermittent modifications occurring during the acquisition of a novel throwing skill

  • J. R. Vorro
  • D. J. Hobart
Chapter
Part of the International Series on Sport Sciences book series (MMSS)

Abstract

Numerous investigators agree that, as a new task is practiced, the manipulation aspect tends to be the major contributor to success (Harris and Smith, 1954; Smader and Smith, 1953; Vorro, 1973; Wehrkamp and Smith, 1952). In addition, Wehrkamp and Smith (1952), Rubin, von Trebra, and Smith (1952), Smader and Smith (1953), and Hobart (1972) agree that travel time decreases as a new skill is acquired. These studies have not, however, sought to determine the point during practice at which the change occurred.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Harris, S. J., and K. U. Smith. 1954. Dimensional analysis of motion. VII. Extent and direction of manipulative movements as factors in defining motions. J. Appl. Psychol. 38: 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hobart, D. J. 1972. A cinematographic and electromyographic analysis of the modifications occurring during the acquisition of a novel throwing task. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Md.Google Scholar
  3. Hobart, D. J., J. Diggs, D. L. Kelley, and D. V. Provenza. 1973. An electronic timer for synchronized electromyography and cinematography. Amer. J. Phys. Med. 52: 243–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hobart, D. J., and D. V. Provenza. 1973. Practical solutions to problems in cinematographic analysis. JOHPER 44: 99–100.Google Scholar
  5. Hobart, D. J., and J. R. Vorro. 1974. Electromyographical analysis of the intermittent modifications occurring during the acquisition of a novel throwing skill. In:R. C. Nelson and C. A. Morehouse (eds.), Biomechanics IV, University Park Press, Baltimore, and S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  6. Rubin, G., P. von Trebra, and K. U. Smith. 1952. Dimensional analysis of motion. III. Complexity of movement pattern. J. Appl. Psychol. 36: 272–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smader, R., and K. U. Smith. 1953. Dimensional analysis of motion. VI. The component movements of assembly motions. J. Appl. Psychol. 37: 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Vorro, J. R. 1973. Stroboscopic study of motion changes that accompany modifications and improvements in a throwing performance. Res. Quart. 44: 216–226.Google Scholar
  9. Wehrkamp, R., and K. U. Smith. 1952. Dimensional analysis of motion. II. Travel-distance effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 36: 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University Park Press 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Vorro
    • 1
  • D. J. Hobart
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Maryland School of DentistryBaltimoreUK

Personalised recommendations