The Role of Economic Factors in Birth-rate Trends and Fluctuations

  • H. Leridon
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)


We all think we know something about that mysterious creature we call homo oeconomicus but is he also ἄυθρωπоѕ δημογράϕικοѕ? This certainly is the assumption implicit in any economic analysis of a series of demographic variables. Homo oeconomicus, no doubt, owes his success to the qualities we attribute to him: he is a rational man, well informed, forward-looking, and he is, to boot, in some way quantifiable. He has a holding and husbands it, he earns an income, he saves, he consumes — all of which can be expressed in monetary terms. Even his time can be measured, his time of work, of rest, of leisure, his years of education, his working life, his retirement. Time and money can be related in many ways (cf. Guitton, 1970).


Industrial Production Economic Factor Marriage Rate Seasonal Component Demographic Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. K. G. Basavarajappa, ‘The Influence of Fluctuations in Economic Conditions on Fertility and Marriage Rates, Australia, 1920 to 1938 and 1946 to 1947’, Population Studies, vol. 25, no. 1 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. V. Galbraith and D. Thomas, ‘Birth Rates and the Interwar Business Cycles’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, xxxvi (Dec 1941).Google Scholar
  3. H. Guitton, A la Recherche du Temps Economique ( Paris: Fayard, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  4. D. Kirk, ‘The Influence of Business Cycles on Marriage and Birth Rates’, Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries (Princeton Univ. Press, 1960 ).Google Scholar
  5. H. Leridon, Natalité, saison et conjoncture économique, I.N.E.D.-P.U.F. ( Paris, 1973 ).Google Scholar
  6. J. Meraud and A. Tymen, ‘Les variations saisonnières de l’activité économique’, Etudes et Conjonctures (Apr 1960).Google Scholar
  7. A. Santini, Nuzialità, Natalità e cicli brevi dell’economia. L’esperenzia Italiana tra il 1863 a il 1965, Dipart. Statist. Matam. (Univ. di Firenzi, 1970). Résumé in Quaderni Storici, Ancona, no. 17 (May 1971).Google Scholar
  8. T. Paul Schultz, ‘An Economic Model of Family Planning and Fertility’, Journal of Political Economy, 77, 2, pt u (Mar—Apr 1969 ).Google Scholar
  9. A. Sweezy, ‘The Economic Explanation of Fertility Changes in the United States’, Population Studies, vol. 25, no. 2 (July 1971).Google Scholar
  10. J. R. Udry, The Effect of the Great Blackout of 1965 on Births in New York City’, Demography, vol. 7, no. 3 (Aug 1970). See note in Economie et Statistiques (Dec 1970).Google Scholar
  11. R. J. Willis, ‘A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behaviour’, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 2, pt 11 (Mar—Apr 1973 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Economic Association 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Leridon
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut National D’etudes DemographiquesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations