The Changing Nature of Industrial Enterprise

  • Gareth P. Dyas
  • Heinz T. Thanheiser

Abstract

Research on the evolution of large industrial enterprise, carried out in Europe and the United States from 1965 to 1972, showed that major changes in the nature of industrial enterprise had recently taken place; changes that proved remarkably similar from country to country.

Keywords

Europe Assure Clarification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J. K. Galbraith, The New Industrial State ( Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1967 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfred D. Chandler, Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, 1962) p. 51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruce R. Scott, ‘The Stages of Corporate Development’, working paper, 1966, revised and expanded in Business Policy Notes 998 and 999, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leonard Wrigley, ‘Divisional Autonomy and Diversification’, unpublished doctoral thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Bruce R. Scott, ‘The Industrial State: Old Myths and New Realities’, Harvard Business Review, Mar—Apr. 1973, pp. 133–48.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Bruce R. Scott, ‘Stages of Corporate Development, Part II’ (BP 999), Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1971, p. 10.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    J.-J. Servan-Schreiber, The American Challenge ( Paris: De Noel, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    J.H. McArthur and B. R. Scott, Industrial Planning in France (Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 1969) p. 176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gareth P. Dyas and Heinz T. Thanheiser 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gareth P. Dyas
    • 1
  • Heinz T. Thanheiser
    • 1
  1. 1.The European Institute of Business AdministrationINSEADUK

Personalised recommendations