Advertisement

The Mechanisation of Physiology

  • C. U. M. Smith
Chapter

Abstract

The successful prosecution of the Cartesian physiological programme depended, as was stressed in chapter 16, on a prior understanding of the sciences of the inorganic. This, as we saw, was largely established by the eighteenth-century chemical revolution. Claude Bernard, who, as we shall see, is particularly well qualified to judge, writes as follows: ‘…it is only since the establishment of chemistry that the experimental method could be applied more thoroughly to physiology and pathology’ (1).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. (2).
    J.A.C.Chaptal, Elements of Chemistry (trans. W. Nicholson), London (1791).Google Scholar
  2. (3).
    J.J. Berzelius, A View of the Progress and Present State of Animal Chemistry (trans. G. Brunnmark), London (1813), p. 4Google Scholar
  3. G.J. Goodfield, The Growth of Scientific Physiology, Hutchinson, London (1960).Google Scholar
  4. (6).
    J. Liebig, Animal Chemistry (trans. W. Gregory), London (1842), p. 12.Google Scholar
  5. (12).
    L. Galvani, De viribus electricitatus, Bologna (1791), p. 4.Google Scholar
  6. (14).
    C. D. O’Malley in The Human Brain and Spinal Cord, University of California Press (1968), pp. 180–1.Google Scholar
  7. (17).
    E. du Bois Reymond, Untersuchungen über thierische Elektricität, vol. 1, Introduction, Berlin (1848)Google Scholar
  8. (18).
    See E.G.T. Liddell, The Discovery of Reflexes, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1960), p. 46.Google Scholar
  9. (19).
    R. Hooke, Micrographia, London (1665); facsimile reprint by Culture et Civilisation, Bruxelles (1966), p. 113.Google Scholar
  10. (22).
    T.S. Hall, Ideas of Life and Matter, vol. 2, Chicago University Press, London (1969).Google Scholar
  11. (24).
    R.J.H. Dutrochet, Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur la structure intime des animaux et sur la motilité, Paris (1824)Google Scholar
  12. (27).
    J.R. Baker, The cell theory: a restatement, history and critique, Q. J. Microsc. Sci., 90 (1949), 103.Google Scholar
  13. (28).
    M.J. Schleiden, Beitrage zur Phytogenesis, Arch. für Anat. and Physiol. (1838)Google Scholar
  14. (29).
    F. Chance, Cellular Pathology, London (1860).Google Scholar
  15. (30).
    Cellular-Pathologie,Arch. für Anat. and Physiol. 8 (1855)Google Scholar
  16. L. J. Rather, Disease, Life and Man: selected essays by Rudolph Virchow, Stanford University Press, Stanford (1958).Google Scholar
  17. (31).
    M. Verworn, Modern physiology, Monist, 4 (1893), 361.Google Scholar
  18. (32).
    C. Bernard, Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale, Paris (1865);Google Scholar
  19. H.C. Green, Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, Dover, New York (1957), p. 225.Google Scholar
  20. (33).
    C. Bernard, Leçons sur les phenoménes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux (ed. A. Dastre), page 112, vol. 1, Paris (1878).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© C.U.M. Smith 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. U. M. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Aston in BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations