Christian Theism: Some Problems of Definition and Methodology
Part of the argument of the preceding chapters was in support of identifying the CEB not only with the God of religion but with the Christian God. Yet the manner of this identification had implications about the nature of Christianity, for example with regard to miracles, the incarnation, the atonement, the trinity and the nature of God, which would be rejected by many or indeed most Christians. The question must therefore be raised whether the position outlined there deserves the label ‘Christian’.
KeywordsChristian Theology Basic Analogy Abstract Identity Preceding Chapter Divine Action
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.H. P. Owen, Concepts of Deity (London: Macmillan, 1970 ) pp. 19–20, 21.Google Scholar
- 4.H. Meynell, God and the World: The Coherence of Christian Theism ( London: S.P.C.K., 1971 ) p. 63.Google Scholar
- 6.P. C. Appleby, ‘On Religious Attitudes’, Religious Studies, vi (Dec 1970) 368.Google Scholar
- 7.C. Hartshorne, The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God ( New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1948 ) p. 38.Google Scholar
- 8.N. Pike, God and Timelessness ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970 ) pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
- 11.C. Hartshorne and W. L. Reese, Philosophers Speak of God (Univ. of Chicago Press, Phoenix Books, 1963) pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
- 14.J. Royce, The Sources of Religious Insight ( Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1912 ) p. 29.Google Scholar
- 15.N. Smart, ‘Myth and Transcendence’, The Monist, L (Oct 1966) 487.Google Scholar