Abstract
The term ‘God of religion’ is chosen for its imprecision and is intended to cover, let us say, the God of the Jews, that of Christians, that of Moslems, and perhaps that of Ramanuja’s Hindu theism. For my first concern is to explore the possible connection between a metaphysical CEB and the theistic religions rather than a particular theistic religion. In the light of the discussion of Chapter 1 the possibility needs to be considered of connecting a metaphysical CEB with religious experience as found in a theistic context.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Jeremias, The Central Message of the New Testament ( London: S.C.M. Press, 1965 ) pp. 16–17.
See B. Russell, Religion and Science ( Oxford Univ. Press, 1935 ) pp. 26–7.
Copyright information
© 1975 John J. Shepherd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shepherd, J.J. (1975). The Metaphysical Argument and Religion. In: Experience, Inference and God. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02436-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02436-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02438-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02436-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)