The Existence of God
At the outset of this study I noted that there were to be three themes, one concerned with the methodology of justification, one concerned with the concept of God, one with assessing actual theistic truth-claims. Chapter 8 marked the close of the second theme, Chapter 9 virtually the close of the first. It remains to round off the third. Is the conclusion to be that belief in the existence of God is after all warranted, or the contrary, or that judgement should be suspended, or some other alternative? For a decision about this has hitherto carefully been avoided.
KeywordsReligious Experience Rational Justification Forced Option Natural Theology Abductive Inference
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.T. Langan, ‘Commentary’ on Fr N. Clarke’s paper in E. H. Madden, R. Handy and M. Farber (eds.), The Idea of God: Philosophical Perspectives ( Springfield, Ill.: Charles Thomas, 1968 ) p. 36.Google Scholar
- 4.K. Walker, Meaning and Purpose ( London: Jonathan Cape, 1944 ) p. 98.Google Scholar
- 6.J. Jeans, The Mysterious Universe ( Cambridge Univ. Press, 1930 ) p. 3.Google Scholar
- 7.see A. Flew and R. W. Hepburn, ‘Problems of Perspective’, Plain View, VII (1955) 151–66; cf.Google Scholar
- 8.J. Wisdom, ‘Gods’, in his Philosophy and Psycho-Analysis (Oxford: Blackwell, 1957) pp. 159–63; cf.Google Scholar
- 10.F. Waismann, ‘How I See Philosophy’, in H. D. Lewis (ed.), Contemporary British Philosophy, Third Series (London: Allen & Unwin, 1924 ) pp. 480–1.Google Scholar
- 13.W. James, ‘The Will to Believe’, in The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1897) p. 11.Google Scholar