Skip to main content

The Levellers and the Franchise

  • Chapter
The Interregnum

Part of the book series: Problems in Focus Series ((PFS))

Abstract

A discussion of the Levellers which concentrates solely on their proposals for a new parliamentary franchise calls for some justification. These proposals formed only one part of the Leveller programme, and not necessarily the most important part at that. In the history of political theory the Levellers are important for many other reasons. They proclaimed that men were born equal and that government could be founded only on consent. They stood for religious toleration and equality before the law. Their concern for civil liberties led them into making the first-known attempt at writing down a law paramount which not even the legislature could alter. Their successive manifestoes, the ‘Agreements of the People’, were the earliest English approximations to a written constitution. They also gave early expression to the doctrine of the separation of powers. If to these achievements we add their advocacy of numerous specific reforms, from the abolition of tithes to the reform of the law, we can recognise that the Levellers have an importance in the history of social and political thought which far transcends any plans they had for remodelling the franchise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • The most important Leveller writings have been collected in Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, ed. William Haller (New York 1933–4; reprinted 1965); Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution, ed. Don M. Wolfe (New York 1944; repr. 1967); The Leveller Tracts, 1647–1653, ed. William Haller and Godfrey Davies (New York 1944; repr. Gloucester, Mass. 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • The text of the Putney Debates was printed by C. H. Firth in vol. i of The Clarke Papers (Camden Soc. 1891–1901). It was re-edited by A. S. P. Wood-house in Puritanism and Liberty (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • The best modern accounts of the Leveller movement are Joseph Frank, The Levellers (Cambridge, Mass. 1955) and Brailsford (the most detailed treatment so far). Theodore Calvin Pease, The Leveller Movement (Washington, D.C. 1916; repr. Gloucester, Mass. 1965) is still strong on the constitutional aspects. Valuable studies of Leveller thought can also be found in W. Schenk, The Concern for Social Justice in the Puritan Revolution (1948); D. B. Robertson, The Religious Foundations of Leveller Democracy (New York 1951); Zagorin, Political Thought; Christopher Hill, ‘The Norman Yoke’, in Puritanism and Revolution (1958); Pauline Gregg, Free-born John. A Biography of John Lilburne (1961). Howard Shaw, The Levellers (1968) is a recent summary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Professor C. B. Macpherson’s interpretation of the Levellers comes in his The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Oxford 1962) pp. 107–59. His arguments have been endorsed by Hill, ‘Pottage for Freeborn Englishmen: Attitudes to Wage Labour in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’, in Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth, ed. C. H. Feinstein (Cambridge 1967). They have been criticised by A. L. Merson, ‘Problems of the English bourgeois revolution’, in Marxism Today, vii (1963); Peter Laslett, ‘Market society and political theory’, HJ, vii (1964), pp. 150–4; J. C. Davis, ‘The Levellers and Democracy’, p&p, xl (1968); and Roger Howell, Jr and David E. Brewster, ‘Reconsidering the Levellers: the evidence of The Moderate’, p&p,xlvi (1970). The most thorough-going critique is A. L. Morton, Leveller Democracy — Fact or Myth? (Our History, pamphlet no. 51, 1968; repr. in his book, The World of the Ranters [1970]).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

G. E. Aylmer

Copyright information

© 1972 G. E. Aylmer, Valerie Pearl, Keith Thomas, Quentin Skinner, Claire Cross, J. P. Cooper, Ivan Roots, David Underdown, Austin Woolrych

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, K. (1972). The Levellers and the Franchise. In: Aylmer, G.E. (eds) The Interregnum. Problems in Focus Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02419-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02419-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-17473-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02419-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics