Skip to main content

Diocletian and Constantine

  • Chapter
A History of Rome

Abstract

Unlike the previous soldier-emperors from the Danubian area Diocletian had no outstanding gifts as a general, although a competent soldier, but he exhibited capacity, or at any rate energy, such as was rarely found among later Roman emperors. It soon became clear that he had pondered over the problems of the Empire and had plans ready to meet them. A new start must be made; no longer could one emperor sit at Rome and control the whole web of interests. He must be in the field where frontiers were threatened, but his personal presence was demanded on many frontiers, since if he sent generals they might be tempted to continue the dreary process of attempted usurpation. Diocletian therefore decided to move around with his staff and court (comitatus) as needed (in fact throughout his reign he visited Rome only once) and at the same time to supplement his own efforts by appointing helpers of outstanding authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. On Diocletian see W. Seston, Diocletien et la Tetra r-chie, i (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On Constantine see N. H. Baynes, Constantine the Great and the Christian Church2 (1972);

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. H. M. Jones, Constantine and the Conversion of Europe (1948);

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Macmullen, Constantine (1969);

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. H. Smith, Constantine the Great (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. On Domitius Domitianus, known from his coins, and Achilleus see W. Seston, Diocletien (1946), 137 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. On the Senate see Ch. Lecrivain, Le Sinai romain depuis Dioclétien (1888); A. H. M. Jones, Later Rom. Emp. 523 ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. W. Arnheim, The Senatorial Aristocracy in the Later Roman Empire (1972);

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. H. M. Jones et al., Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, i. (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See S. S. Frere, Britannia (1967), 248 ff., 338 ff. The dating of city-walls is notoriously difficult. It would seem that in Britain earthwork defences were widely constructed in the unsettled period between Marcus Aurelius and Severus and that masonry walls were added to the earth ramparts before (but in some cases, not long before) the time of Carausius. Their style seems to be a little earlier than that of the town-walls of Gaul, most of which are Diocletianic.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See O. Brogan, Roman Gaul (1953), 215 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For an archaeological survey of the manner in which Roman methods of fortification were developed in the north-western portion of the Empire from the mid-third century onwards in order to meet the barbarian pressure see H. von Petrikovits, IRS 1971, 175 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1975 The representatives of the estate of the late M. Cary and H. H. Scullard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cary, M., Scullard, H.H. (1975). Diocletian and Constantine. In: A History of Rome. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02415-5_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics