The Roman Empire under Augustus

  • M. Cary
  • H. H. Scullard

Abstract

After the civil wars Augustus had a free hand to reshape the foreign policy of Rome as thoroughly as he had reconstructed its internal administration. With all the armed forces of the Empire at his permanent disposal, he had ample means to resume and to extend Caesar’s schemes of conquest. Public opinion at Rome, which had but recently hailed him as the bringer of internal peace, presently urged him to fresh wars against foreign enemies, including Britain and Parthia. The emperor perceived that by advancing the Roman frontiers he might strengthen the defences of empire at some points and open new avenues of trade at others. He realised the need of finding employment for the troops, so as to turn their thoughts from fresh civil wars, and he was not loth to provide opportunities of military distinction for the younger members of his family On the other hand Augustus could not be blind to what the Senate of the later Republic had clearly seen, that foreign expeditions were a seed-bed of military usurpations.

Keywords

Flare Cataract Gallia Sonal Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 3.
    For Petronius’s expedition see S. Jameson, YRS 1968, 71 ff., who believes that Augustus’s real intention was conquest.Google Scholar
  2. On Ethiopia see P. L. Shinnie, Meroë (1967).Google Scholar
  3. On the destruction of Aden see M. P. Charles-Worth, Cl. Rev. 1928, 99.Google Scholar
  4. On the Indian embassies (Res Gestae 31.1), see E. H. Warmington, The Commerce between the Roman Empire and India (1928), 35 ff., who shows that more than one mission reached Rome.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    On the colonies see B. Levick, Roman Colonies in Southern Asia Minor (1967).Google Scholar
  6. On the Spanish Wars see R. Syme, AJPhil. 1934, 293 ff.;Google Scholar
  7. W. Schmitthenner, Historia 1962, 29 ff.Google Scholar
  8. For the sources see A. Schulten, Fontes Hispaniae Antiquae (1940), 183 ff.Google Scholar
  9. On the Augustan reorganisation see C. H. V. Sutherland, The Romans in Spain (1939), ch. vii.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    On Gaul see N. J. de Witt, Urbanisation and the Franchise in Roman Gaul (1940);Google Scholar
  11. O. Brogan, Roman Gaul (1953);Google Scholar
  12. J. J. Hatt, Histoire de la Gaule romaine (1966); A. Grenier in T. Frank, Econ.SRE iii. 379 ff.Google Scholar
  13. For the surviving monuments see P. MacKendrick, Roman France (1972).Google Scholar
  14. On archaeological work in Gaul carried out from 1955 to 1970 see R. Chevallier, JRS 1971, 243 ff.Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    Coinage throws much light on the native British dynasties before the Claudian conquest. For the 100 years between Caesar and Claudius see S. S. Frere, Britannia (1967), ch. 3. On contacts and trade between Gaul and Britain see Strabo, iii. 199–201.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    On the Augustan conquest of this whole area see J. J. Wilkes, Dalmatia (1969), ch. 5.Google Scholar
  17. On the history of Noricum see G. Alföldy, Noricum (1974).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    On the imperial Roman army see H. M. D. Parker, The Roman Legions (1958);Google Scholar
  19. G. L. Cheesman, The Auxilia of the Imperial Roman Army (1914);Google Scholar
  20. G. Webster, The Roman Imperial Army (1969);Google Scholar
  21. on army service from the point of view of the ordinary soldier, G. R. Watson, The Roman Soldier (1969).Google Scholar
  22. See also M. Grant, The Army of the Caesars (1974).Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    On the collegia iuvenum see L. R. Taylor, JRS 1924, 158 ff.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    On the navy see C. G. Starr, The Roman Imperial Navy (1960).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    On Herod and his successors see A. H. M. Jones, The Herods of Judaea (1938)Google Scholar
  26. M. Grant, Herod the Great (1971)Google Scholar
  27. and H. W. Hoehner, Herod Antipas (1972).Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    On emperor-worship in general see L. Cerfaux and J. Tondriau, Le Culte des Souverains (1956); Le Culte des Souverains dans l’Empire romain, Entretiens Hardt, xix, 1973).Google Scholar
  29. See also L. R. Taylor, The Divinity of the Roman Emperor (1931).Google Scholar
  30. On the formula invented by Augustus for tactfully declining divine honours see M. P. Charlesworth, PBSR 1939, 1 ff.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    On the provincial concilia see E. G. Hardy, Studies in Roman History (1906), ch. 13;Google Scholar
  32. P. Guiraud. Les Assemblées provinciales dans l’empire romain (1887);Google Scholar
  33. D. Magie, Roman Rule in Asia Minor (1950);Google Scholar
  34. J. A. O. Larsen, Representative Government in Greek and Roman History (1955), 106 ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The representatives of the estate of the late M. Cary and H. H. Scullard 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Cary
    • 1
  • H. H. Scullard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LondonUK

Personalised recommendations