Skip to main content

Costs, Revenue and Returns 1880–1914

  • Chapter
Cunard and the North Atlantic 1840–1973
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

We must now return to the early 1880s. John Burns had become Chairman of the recently incorporated Company and the keynote of new activity was sounded by him in his speech at the Ordinary General Meeting on 27 April 1881. ‘The steam navigation of this country’, he declared, ‘like almost every branch of industry, is carried on under circumstances of keen competition and, for any company to succeed, it must be possessed of the best boats with which to do its work efficiently … coupled with which there has to be the strictest observance of economy in details.’1 Against the background of such an objective it was proposed to apply the Company’s reserves to the building of large powerful ships while at the same time reducing liabilities and working costs. By such a policy it was hoped that more than adequate facilities would be provided for meeting likely changes in the pattern of trade. In retrospect this was a bold decision, designed as it was to offset prospective loss and increase competitive strength in those branches of the trade likely to be subjected to fluctuating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ibid., Article 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MIP, Correspondence, David MacIver to Charles MacIver 1874–5 as cited in Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CP, SLB, Charles MacIver to Bateson, Bright and Warr, 6 July 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MIP, Press cuttings Liverpool Daily Post, 13 January 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., under 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 52, 65–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. E. Hyde, Liverpool and the Mersey, op. cit., p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CP, SLB, John Burns to M.D.H.B., 23 November 1893; 13 December; 1893; 8 February 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., 23 November 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., 13 December 1893; the Dock Board disclaimed the view put forward by John Burns.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., 23 November 1893; ‘the strange conclusion would follow’, wrote Burns, ‘that by the trustees of the port these large ships would be actually driven from it.’

    Google Scholar 

  19. cit., p. 52; T. H. Ismay’s efforts to persuade the Dock Board to do this dated back to 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CP, Accounts and related papers; report of the directors, 10 April 1885; VR, 27 March 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., Ivernia was of 14,278 tons gross, twin screws with quadruple-expansion engines; Saxonia was of 14,297 tons gross with same engine power.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CP, Report ofthe directors, 21 April 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  29. CP, Report on the Negotiations in relation to the Agreement of the 30 July 1903, made between H.M. Government and the Company, prepared by the Companys Solicitors for the use of the Chairman and Directors, 2 vols (1905); hereafter cited Cunard and the Government; I, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 32, 3 March 1902. Messrs Watson and Smith, stockbrokers of Glasgow, called upon Messrs Penny and MacGeorge, stockbrokers acting for the trustees of the late Lord Inverclyde, to find out what price would be taken for a large block of Cunard shares.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  32. I, 22: Mr O’Hagan’s many activities are recorded in his autobiography, Leaves from my Life, 2 vols (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., I, 32, 3 March 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., I, 34–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid., I, 38; Sir Christopher Furness had a first interview with Lord Inverclyde on 12 April 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., I, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  37. CP, Correspondence, Lord Inverclyde to Lord Selborne, 12 March 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid., Lord Selborne to Lord Inverclyde, 13 March 1902; Lord Inverclyde to Lord Selborne, 18 March 1902; CP, Cunard and the Govt, I, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid., Lord Inverclyde to Lord Selborne, 18 March 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  41. CP, Correspondence, Lord Selborne to Lord Inverclyde, 5 April 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  43. CP, Correspondence, Lord Inverclyde to Lord Selborne, 29 March 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  44. CP, Correspondence, Lord Inverclyde to Lord Selborne, 29 March 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  45. CP, Correspondence, Lord Inverclyde to Lord Selborne, 29 March 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bruce Ismay, 18 May 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  47. CP, Correspondence, Lord Selborne to Lord Inverclyde, 24 April 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  48. CP, Cunard and the Govt, I, 46, 5 May 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Eaves, op. cit., under 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., 4 June 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., 4 June 1902, J. Bruce Ismay to C. Dawkins or J. P. Morgan, junior.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dawkins to J. Bruce Ismay, 5 June 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  54. B. Peat to Lord Inverclyde, 11 June 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Furness to Lord Inverclyde, 3 July 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., 70.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chamberlain, 1 August 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid.,

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chamberlain to Lord Inverclyde, 4 August 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  60. W. Balfour to Lord Inverclyde, 7 August 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  61. W. Balfour to Lord Inverclyde, 26 September 1902; WS, Cable dated 1 October 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  62. CP, Agreement under Treasury minute, 31 July 1903, Second Schedule, Clauses 2A and 2B.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid., Part I, Clause 5, Section 5.

    Google Scholar 

  64. An overdraft to the O.S.N. Co. was increased from £400,000 to £550,000 and extended under subsequent arrangements to 1907. This information was supplied by Mr P. Cotterell, Department of Economic History, The University, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  65. CP, Analysis from reports of directors and accounts, 1880–1914.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibid., 1907–14.

    Google Scholar 

  67. CP, Report of directors and accounts for OGM, 15 April 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  68. RC. on Unseaworthy Ships, Final Report and Minutes of Evidence (1874) Vol. 7; Evidence by John Burns, 24 April 1874, Q.14,985.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ibid., Q. 15,006.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid., Q.15,009.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  72. CP, Analysis from reports of directors and accounts, 1880–1914.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1975 Francis E. Hyde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyde, F.E. (1975). Costs, Revenue and Returns 1880–1914. In: Cunard and the North Atlantic 1840–1973. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02390-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics