Skip to main content
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

The successful operation of The British and North American Royal Mail Steam Packet Company during the first forty years of its history was governed by a diverse range of economic, financial and political influences. These influences, in turn, helped in shaping policies relating to the building of new ships, in maintaining mail contracts and services; in entering new trades and in ordering the conduct of business within the framework of a strict code of discipline. The continuous endeavours of the managing partners to meet and overcome successive problems arising from the expansion of steamship services, created lines of policy which, in course of time, came to be regarded as traditional in the conduct of the Company’s affairs. What service was achieved in the first formative years has to be set against a background of both opposition and of the growing technical competence of other steamship companies. Even with government backing (or, perhaps, despite such backing) Cunard could not afford to be complacent. In commercial matters there is much evidence for the belief that the managers were equal in all respects to their rivals; but in technological development they were inhibited by varying degrees of conservatism and by the need to conform to official directive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Eaves, op. cit., under 1856 and 1862; J. Napier, Life of Robert Napier (1904), pp. 192, 195.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For the effects of this on Cunard see CP, H. Eaves, op. cit., 1854–1862; for the effect on the P. and O. see Boyd Cable, A Hundred Years of the P. and O. (1937). pp. 135–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hon. Sir C. Wood, Bart., M.P., First Lord of the Admiralty, on the Mail Steam Ship Contract System printed for the author in 1856. The author styled himself as the writer of the Universal Steam Packet Guide of 1841.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. MIP, Correspondence, Charles MacIver to John Burns, 12 April 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Smith, A Short History of Naval and Marine Engineering (1938), p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Strassman, Risk and Technological lnnovation (1959), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Bastin, M. A. Thesis ‘Cunard and the Liverpool Emigrant Trade 1860 to 1900’, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Bastin, op. cit., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. C. Smith, op. cit., p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CP, VR, Ordinary General Meeting 10 April 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Oldham, The Ismay Line (1961), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 1873, Royal Commission on Unseaworthy Ships, XXXVI (C.853), 325.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Report of the Select Committee on The Halifax and Boston Mails (1849), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 138; CP, H. Eaves, op. cit., under 1846.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eaves, op. cit., under 1847; CP, Mail Contracts, J. Austin, ‘Liverpool and the Atlantic Ferry’ Proceedings of the Inst. Mech. Engineers, 26 June 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Howard Robinson, op. cit., p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Albion, The Rise of New York Port (1815–1860) (1970), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. G. Albion, op. cit., pp. 323–5

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Maginnis, The Atlantic Ferry (1900), p. 48. Washington (2000 tons) and Hermann (2200 tons) were wooden paddle steamships.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MIP, Correspondence, Samuel Cunard to Viscount Canning, 21 May 1853; also quoted Howard Robinson, op. cit., p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tyler, Steam Conquers the Atlantic, (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Albion, op. cit., pp. 325–30; CP, H. Eaves, op. cit., under 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. G. Albion, op. cit., pp. 325–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. G. Albion, op. cit., pp. 325–6

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kennedy, History of Steam Navigation (1903), p. 99. This objective seemed to be capable of realisation when in 1852 the Collins line succeeded in carrying one third more passengers than Cunard between Liverpool and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. G. Albion, op. cit., p. 326

    Google Scholar 

  37. Austin, op. cit., p. 94. The ships were fitted with side-lever engines, balanced poppet valves and four vertical tubular boilers.

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. G. Albion, op. cit., p. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  39. MIP, Memo from Charles MacIver to his partners, 1 March 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. G. Albion, op. cit., p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eaves, op. cit., under 1856; Persia was delivered in 1856 and in her first year made the crossing from New York to Liverpool on four occasions in less than 9½ days; A. J. Maginnis, op. cit., pp. 30, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. G. Albion, op. cit., p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. G. Albion, op. cit., p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Eaves, op. cit., under 1856; R. G. Albion, op. cit., pp. 328, 330.

    Google Scholar 

  48. R. G. Albion, op. cit., p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  49. MIP, Correspondence, Samuel Cunard to Charles MacIver, 1 May 1847.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid., Clause 7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid., Clauses 8 and 9.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., Clauses 2 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., Clause 2.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., Clause 4.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., Clause 10.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid., Clause 13.

    Google Scholar 

  61. MIP, Memorandum of Agreement, 11 November 1856, ‘the Agreement existing between the two companies, dated 24 February 1853, is and shall continue suspended and be considered void from 31 March 1855 (when the last settlement was made) until the new United States Mail steamer Adriatic takes her place on the line’.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  63. MIP, Correspondence, James Brown to Brown, Shipley and Co., 13 December 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  65. MIP, Correspondence, 2 July 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  66. MIP, Memo on distribution of earnings 1850–55.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  74. These were general instructions drawn up by Charles MacIver and distributed to captains by D. and C. MacIver.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  78. MIP, 25 March 1848.

    Google Scholar 

  79. F. L. Babcock, Spanning the Atlantic, (1931), pp. 84–5, 103, 121, 125–6; Liverpool Journal of Commerce, 4 April 1932, 11 May 1932, 18 May 1934, giving accounts of Captain Judkin’s exploits during his successive commands of Columbia, Persia and Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Eaves, op. cit., under 1848; MIP, Charles MacIver’s instructions to captains, 1848.

    Google Scholar 

  81. A. J. Maginnis, op. cit., p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  86. MIP, Correspondence, 23 November 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  88. B. Forwood, Reminiscences of a Liverpool Shipowner (1920), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sir Rowland Hill and G. B. Hill, Li.fe of Rowland Hill (1880), II, pp. 183, 211; 6th Report PMG (1860); 14th Report (1868), cited Howard Robinson, op. cit., p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  92. MIP, British and North American Mail Contracts and Relative Papers, 1869; PMG to Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, 8 February 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ibid., 26 April 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ibid., John Burns to Frank Ives Scudamore, GPO, 9 February 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ibid., Mail contracts North German Lloyd, 3 December 1868 and Inman, 12 December 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  97. cit., PMG to Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, 24 October 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  98. cit., John Burns to Frank Ives Scudamore, GPO, 9 February 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ibid., Mail contracts, op. cit., loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  102. cit., John Burns to the Secretary, GPO, 31 August 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  103. cit., PMG to Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, 24 October 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ibid., Mail contract signed 11 December 1868, Clause 2.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ibid., Mail contracts, Inman 12 December 1868, Clause 13; Cunard December 1868, Clause 16.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Ibid., Mail contract, N.D.L. 3 December 1868, Clause 1.

    Google Scholar 

  108. cit., John Burns to F. I. Scudamore, GPO, 9 February 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ibid., ‘I may add’, said Burns, ‘that equally with ourselves Mr Inman has the strongest objection to any further curtailment of the duration of the Contract.’

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  111. MIP, Agreements, 4 March 1880.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1975 Francis E. Hyde

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyde, F.E. (1975). Men, Ships and Mails 1840–80. In: Cunard and the North Atlantic 1840–1973. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02390-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics