Coleridge: A Bridge between Science and Poetry
One may reasonably ask at the outset why the Royal Institution should celebrate the bicentenary of an English poet, especially one commonly reputed to be anything but a scientist. The answer lies in the remarkableness of both institutions, Coleridge and the Royal one (for Coleridge is a kind of institution in himself); both are characterised by an imaginative facility in looking at the specific in their field of vision, and also at the wider ranges of more general and complex human considerations. It was natural that Coleridge and the Royal Institution, soon after its founding in 1799, should find each other. The view that Coleridge was anti-science is quite erroneous. Nor did he believe in a world of two cultures.
KeywordsRoyal Institution Bilge Water Impersonal Pronoun English Poet Chemical Philosophy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.See her letter of 8 Oct 1802, quoted Sir Harold Hartley, Humphry Davy (1968) p. 44.Google Scholar
- 6.E. Darwin, Phytologia (1800) pp. 560–3.Google Scholar
- 7.J. A. Paris, Life of Sir Humphry Davy (1831) I 74–5.Google Scholar
- 9.Hartley, op. cit., p. 42;Google Scholar
- R. Sharrock, ‘The Chemist and the Poet: Sir Humphry Davy and the Preface to the Lyrical Ballads’. Notes and Records of the Royal Society (1962) xvii 63.Google Scholar
- 10.Sharrock, loc. cit., 62, 66; Hartley, op. cit., 25.Google Scholar
- 11.J. Cottle, Reminiscences of S. T. Coleridge and R. Southey (1847) p. 329.Google Scholar
- 13.F. W. J. von Schelling, Darlegung des wahren Verhältnisses der Naturphilosophie zu verbesserten Fichte’schen Lehre, etc. (Tübingen 1806) pp. 125–6. (BM copy C. 126.f.7 ).Google Scholar
- 14.J. A. Paris, op. cit., 138.Google Scholar
- 28.Marginal note to Aurora in Jacob Boehme, Works (1764–81) I 41–2 (BM copy C. 126.k.1).Google Scholar