Aqueous pores created in thin lipid membranes by the antibiotics nystatin, amphotericin B and gramicidin A: implications for pores in plasma membranes

  • A. Finkelstein
Part of the Biological Council book series


Since the days of Bärlund and Collander (see Collander, 1937), physiologists have suggested that ions, water, and small hydrophilic non-electrolytes cross the lipoidal plasma membrane through polar pores or channels.’ Recent work with model membranes has established that indeed unmodified lipid bilayers are so poorly permeable to polar non-electrolytes and especially to small ions that these species require parallel pathways via either carriers or pores for significant transport (Mueller & Rudin, 1969). On the other hand, water permeability coefficients of unmodified lipid bilayers span almost the entire range of values reported for plasma membranes, making it unnecessary to invoke aqueous pores in explanation of large water permeabilities of some cells. In point of fact, however, the assumption that water crosses plasma membranes through aqueous pores depends less on the magnitude of the water permeability than on two other factors: first, the significant differences between the osmotic permeability coefficient (Pf) and the tagged water permeability coefficient (Pd) (for example, Prescott & Zeuthen, 1953; Nevis, 1958) and secondly, the occurrence of water—solute interaction during osmosis (for example, Koefoed-Johnsen & Ussing, 1953; Goldstein & Solomon, 1960). These two findings, however, have been challenged as artifactual, because of the presence of unstirred aqueous layers in the experiments (Dainty, 1963).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bean, C. P. (1972). In: Membranes Vol. 1, Macroscopic Systems and Models. ed. Eisenman, G. p. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  2. Collander, R. (1937). Trans. Faraday Soc., 33, 985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dainty, J. (1963). Advan. Bot. Res., 1, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finkelstein, A. & Holz, R. (1973). In: Membranes, Vol. 2, Lipid Bilayers and Antibiotics. ed. Eisenman, G. p. 377. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein, D. A. & Solomon, A. K. (1960). J. gen. Physiol., 44, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hille, B. (1970). Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 21, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hladky, S. B. & Haydon, D. A. (1972). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 274, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holz, R. & Finkelstein, A. (1970). J. gen. Physiol., 56, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunter, M. J. (1971). J. Physiol., Lond., 218, 49 P.Google Scholar
  10. Koefoed-Johnsen, V. & Ussing, H. H. (1953). Acta physiol. scand., 28, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Macey, R. I. & Farmer, R. E. L. (1970). Biochim biophys. Acta, 211, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mechlinski, W., Schaffner, C. P., Ganis, P. & Avitabile, G. (1970). Tetrahedron Letters, No. 44, 3873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mueller, P. & Rudin, D. O. (1969). Curr. Top. Bioenerg., 3, 157.Google Scholar
  14. Muller; R. U. & Finkelstein, A. (1972). J. gen. Physiol., 60, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Myers, V. B. & Haydon, D. A. (1972). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 274, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nevis, A. H. (1958). J. gen. Physiol., 41, 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paganelli, C. V. & Solomon, A. K. (1957). J. gen. Physiol., 41, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prescott, D. M. & Zeuthen, E. (1953). Acta physiol. scand., 28, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scarpa, A., Cecchetto, A. & Azzone, G. F. (1970). Biochim. biophys. Acta, 219, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Urry, D. W., Goodall, M. C., Glickson, J. D. & Mayers, D. F. (1971). Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Biology Endowment Trust Fund 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Finkelstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Physiology and NeurologyAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva UniversityBronx, New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations