Advertisement

The Management of the Quality of the Environment

  • Clifford S. Russell
  • Walter O. SpoffordJr.
  • Edwin T. Haefele
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

One of the minor benefits of the recent wave of environmental concern is that arguments about technological externalities and unpriced resources are sufficiently familiar to require no reiteration or elaboration before a group of economists. Consequently we need not spend time explaining that there are interesting economic issues in the environmental field, but can go right to the background of our approach.

Keywords

Regional Model Linear Programming Model Preference Vector Ordinal Ranking Delaware Estuary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. [1]
    Black, R. J., et al., The National Solid Wastes Survey: An Interim Report, presented at the 1968 Annual Meeting of the Institute for Solid Wastes of the American Public Works Association (Miami Beach, Oct 1968).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brown, G. W., ‘Predicting Temperatures of Small Streams’, Water Resources Res., vol. 5, no. 1 (1969) p. 68.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Burt, W. V., ‘Heat Budget Terms for Middle Snake River Reservoir’, in ‘Water Temperature Studies on the Snake River’, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Report, no. 6 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chen, C. W., ‘Concepts and Utilities of Ecologic Models’, J. Sanitary Eng. Div., Proc. A.S.C.E., vol. 96, SA5, Proc. Paper 7602 (Oct 1970) pp. 1085–1097.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Combustion Engineering, Inc., Technical Economic Study of Solid Waste Disposal Needs and Practices, IV (U.S.D.H.E.W., Bureau of Solid Waste Management, Rockville, Md., 1969).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cootner, P., and Löf, G. O. G., Water Demand for Steam-Electric Generation (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1965).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dales, J. H., Pollution, Property and Prices (Univ. of Toronto Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Delaware River Basin Commission, Final Progress Report: Delaware Estuary and Bay Water Quality Sampling and Mathematical Modeling Project (May 1970).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Delay, W. H., and Seaders, J., ‘Predicting Temperatures in Rivers and Reservoirs’, J. Sanitary Eng. Div., Proc. A.S.C.E., vol. 92 (1966) pp. 115–34.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Delson, J. K., and Frankel, R., ‘Residuals Management in the Coal-Energy Industry’, unpublished MS (Resources for the Future, Inc., Aug 1972).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    DiToro, D. M., O’Connor, D. J., and Thomann, R. V., ‘A Dynamic Model of the Phytoplankton Population in the Sacramento—San Joaquin Delta’, in Advances in Chemistry Series, no. 106, ‘Nonequilibrium Systems in Natural Water Chemistry’ (American Chemical Society, 1971).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dorfman, R., and Jacoby, H., ‘A Model of Public Decisions Illustrated by a Water Pollution Policy Problem’, in The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The P.P.B. System (Joint Economic Committee, Washington, U.S.G.P.O., 1969) I, pp. 226–74.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Dorfman, R., Dorfman, R., and Thomas, H. A. (eds.), Models for Managing Regional Water Quality (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1973).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Duttweiler, D. W., et al., ‘Heat Dissipation in Flowing Streams’, Report of the 1960-1961 Advanced Seminar (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1962).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Environmental News (E.P.A., Washington, D.C.) 30 Jan 1971.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Fiacco, F. A., and McCormick, G. P., Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimisation Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Haefele, E. T., ‘Coalitions, Minority Representation, and Vote-Trading Probabilities’, Public Choice, vol. 8 (spring 1970) pp. 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Haefele, E. T., ‘A Utility Theory of Representative Government’, Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 61, no. 3 (June 1971) pp. 350–67.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Haefele, E. T., ‘Social Choice in Residuals Management: Politicising an Economic Model’, Proc. Amer. Pol. Sci. Assoc. (Chicago, Sep 1971).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Haefele, E. T., ‘Environmental Quality as a Problem of Social Choice’, in Kneese, A. V., and Bower, B. T. (eds.), Environmental Quality Analysis: Theory and Method in the Social Sciences (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1972).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Holzworth, G. C, ‘Estimates of Mean Maximum Mixing Depths in the Contiguous United States’, Monthly Weather Review, vol. 92, no. 5 (May 1964) pp. 235–42.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Holzworth, Mixing Heights, Wind Speeds, and Potential for Urban Air Pollution throughout the Contiguous United States, Publ. No. AP-101 E.P.A (Office of Air Programs, Research Triangle Park, N.C., Jan 1972 (also available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Johnson, E., ‘A Study in the Economics of Water Quality Management’, Water Resources Res., vol. 3, no. 2 (1967) pp. 291–305.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kelly, R. A., ‘Conceptual Ecosystem Model of the Delaware Estuary’ (mimeo, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C, 1972).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. U., and D’Arge, R. C, Economics and the Environment (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C, 1970).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Kohn, R., ‘Linear Programming Model for Air Pollution Control: A Pilot Study of the St. Louis Airshed’, Paper 69–64, 62nd Annual Meeting, Air Pollution Control Association (New York City, June 1969).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Löf, G. O. G., and Kneese, A. V., The Economics of Water Utilisation in the Beet Sugar Industry (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C, 1968).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Madison, James, The Federalist Papers (1787).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Martin, D. O., and Tikvart, J. A., ‘A General Atmospheric Diffusion Model for Estimating the Effects on Air Quality of One or More Sources’, A.P.C.A. Journal (June 1968) pp. 68–148.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    New York Times, 22 Jan 1972, p. 27; 27 Jan 1972, p. 18.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Ozolins, G., and Smith, R., ‘A Rapid Survey Technique for Estimating Community Air Pollution Emissions’, P.H.S. Publ. No. 999-AP-29 (National Air Pollution Control Administration, Raleigh, N.C, Oct 1958) App. C, pp. 43–5.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Pasquill, F., Atmospheric Diffusion (Van Nostrand, London, 1962).Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Russell, C. S., ‘Models for the Investigation of Industrial Response to Residuals Management Action’, Swedish J. Econ., vol. 73, no. 1 (1971) pp. 134–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Russell, C. S., and Spofford, W. O., Jr., ‘A Quantitative Framework for Residuals Management Decisions’, in Kneese, A. V., and Bower, B. T. (eds.), Environmental Quality Analysis: Theory and Method in the Social Sciences (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1972) chap. 4.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Russell, C. S., ‘Models of Response to Residuals Management Action: A Case Study of Petroleum Refining’, to be published by Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Russell, C. S., ‘Municipal Evaluation of Regional Water Management Proposals’, in Dorfman, R., Jacoby, H., and Thomas, H. A. (eds.), Models for Managing Regional Water Quality (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1973) chap. 4.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Schaumberg, G., Water Pollution Control in the Delaware Estuary (Harvard Water Program, Cambridge, Mass., 1967).Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Smith, R., ‘Costs of Conventional and Advanced Treatment of Waste Water’, J. Water Pollution Control Fed. (Sept 1968) pp. 1546–74.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Streeter, H. W., and Phelps, E. B., ‘A Study of the Pollution and Natural Purification of the Ohio River’, Public Health Service Bulletin, no. 146 (Washington, D.C., 1923).Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    T.R.W., Inc., Air Quality Implementation Planning Program (Environmental Protection Agency, Nov 1970) I and II (also available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. 22151, PB 198 299 and PB 198 300 respectively).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    U.S. Department of Commerce, Climatic Atlas of the United States (U.S.G.P.O., Washington, D.C., June 1968).Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs, Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (Research Triangle Park, N.C., Feb 1972) pp. 1–4 to 1–7.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Wright, W. A., ‘Alternative Approaches to Water Quality Management in the Trent River Basin’, unpublished dissertation (University College, Oxford) 21 Mar 1972.Google Scholar

Reference

  1. [1]
    Mills, E., ‘Sensitivity Analysis of Congestion and Structure in an Efficient Urban Area’, in Rothenberg, J., and Heggie, I. G. (eds.), Transport and the Urban Environment (Macmillan, London, 1974).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Drèze, J., and de la Vallée Poussin, D., ‘A Tâtonnement Process for Public Goods’, Rev. Econ. Studies, vol. 37 (1971) pp. 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Malinvaud, E., ‘A Planning Approach to the Public Good Problem’, Swedish J. Econ., vol. 73 (1971) pp. 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Haefele, E. T., ‘A Utility Theory of Representative Government’, Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 61, no. 3 (1971) pp. 350–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clifford S. Russell
  • Walter O. SpoffordJr.
  • Edwin T. Haefele

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations