Skip to main content
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

The conflict between King and Queen dragged on. The affair continued to demand the attention of both Houses and to prejudice the chances of survival of the government. On three occasions during this year, parliament was to be obliged to debate the question of the inclusion of the Queen’s name in the liturgy, and the current of social unrest which accompanied these debates was not to subside until the Queen’s death on 7 August 1821. As members gathered early in the year for the opening of the new session, the whigs were optimistic about their chances of a return to power. The ministry had lost the confidence of the King because of the manner in which it had handled the royal scandal. The able George Canning had felt it necessary to resign his Presidency of the Board of Control. In addition, the tories were extremely unpopular in the country at large. Liverpool’s administration had clearly reached a major turning point.

He dreaded the possibility of a conflict of which they had already seen some symptoms between the landed and the funded proprietor, as to the share which each should bear in the general calamity … One of the most baneful consequences, first of the vast creation of monied capital by the paper system; and secondly, of the great comparative depreciation of all other property, was, the increased influence of the monied interests on the institutions and government of the country.

Edward Ellice

House of Commons, 9 April 1821

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the revival in Manchester, see Arthur Redford, Manchester Merchants and Foreign Trade, 1794–1858 (1934; Manchester University Press, 1973) 74–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See John Craig, Remarks on some fundamental doctrines of political economy … (Edinburgh, 1821);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Piercy Ravenstone, A few doubts as to the correctness of some opinions generally entertained on the subjects of population and political economy (London, 1821);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anon, ‘Mill’s Elements of Political Economy’, The British Critic, XVII (February 1822) 130–47;

    Google Scholar 

  5. and Anon, ‘Mill’s Elements of Political Economy’, Monthly Review, XCVIII (May 1822) 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For discussion of Attwood’s ideas and influence consult Thomas Attwood, Selected Economic Writings (intro. by F. W. Fetter) (London School of Economics, 1964);

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. G. Checkland, ‘The Birmingham Economists, 1815–1850’, Economic History Review (2nd series) I, 1 (1948) 1–19;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. G. Link, English Theories of Economic Fluctuations 1815–1848 (N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1959);

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. A. Corry, Money, Saving and Investment in English Economics, 1800–1850 (London: Macmillan, 1962);

    Google Scholar 

  10. and G. D. H. Cole, Chartist Portraits (N.Y.: Macmillan, 1965) 102–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A full-length study is S. G. Checkland, The Gladstones: A Family Biography, 1764–1851 (Cambridge University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. These included: Sir Solly, Considerations on Political Economy (London, 1821), esp. 65–9;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sir Egerton Brydges, What are Riches? (Geneva, 1821)

    Google Scholar 

  14. and James Syme, The Principles of Political Economy applied to the financial state of Great Britain (London, 1821) esp. Chapter 3, Sect. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See also A. Hope-Jones, Income Tax in the Napoleonic Wars (Cambridge, 1939);

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Farnsworth, Addington, Author of the Modern Income Tax (London, 1951);

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Shehab, Progressive Taxation (Oxford, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  18. This plan is discussed in W. D. Grampp, The Manchester School of Economics (Stanford University Press, 1960) 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Also of interest is William Smart, Economic Annals of the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols (London, 1910–15; republished, N.Y., 1964) II, 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1976 Barry Gordon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gordon, B. (1976). 1821: Fundholders and Landholders. In: Political Economy in Parliament 1819–1823. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02119-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics