Abstract
The Ricardo Plan for resumption, as recommended by the Secret Committees, was debated in the Lords on 21 May. However before the debate proper, Lauderdale introduced a petition from the merchants of London requesting retention of the restriction on cash payments.l The Earl was most sympathetic to the viewpoint of the petitioners inasmuch as ‘they objected to the plan of the Bank committees, as tending to produce a forced diminution of the circulating medium, and thereby to cause the greatest distress …’
No country in the world had ever established a currency without a fixed standard of value … It might be gold, it might be silver, it might be copper, or even iron. It might be anything that had real value in it; though the metals had been preferred for this purpose by the general consent of all nations. But it could not be paper, which has no value, and is only promise of value’.
The Earl of Liverpool
House of Lords, 21 May 1819.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
and Sir John Craig, The Mint (Cambridge University Press, 1953) 284–8.
See, e.g., Ephraim Gompertz, A Theoretic Discourse on the Nature and Property of Money (London: Richardson, 1820).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1976 Barry Gordon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gordon, B. (1976). 1819: The Debates on Resumption. In: Political Economy in Parliament 1819–1823. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02119-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02119-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02121-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02119-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)