Introduction: Politicians and Principles

  • Barry Gordon


This is a study of the interaction of economic doctrine, political practice and the train of events during difficult days for the British economy. The period was also a crucial one in the development of economic thought.


Real Wage Money Supply Money Wage Parliamentary Debate British Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    On the post-war years to 1819, consult R. J. White, Waterloo to Peterloo (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A relevant study is Oliver MacDonagh, A Pattern of Government Growth, 1800–60 (London: MacGibbon &; Kee, 1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The definitive collection of his works, together with a wealth of biographical information, is Piero Sraffa (in collaboration with M. H. Dobb), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, I–X (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953–5).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Concerning the link between Ricardo’s thought and the appearance of a new style of civil servant, see S. E. Finer, The Life and Times of Sir Edwin Chadwick (London: Methuen, 1952), esp. 19–27.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    See, e.g., Elie Halévy, The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism (London: Faber, 1952) 340–2.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    F. W. Fetter, ‘The Rise and Decline of Ricardian Economics’, History of Political Economy, I, 1 (spring 1969) 72.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Cf. J. A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis (N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1954) 471–2.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Henry Lord Brougham, Historical Sketches of Statesmen Who Flourished in the Time of George III, Second Series (London: Knight, 1839) 189.Google Scholar
  9. T. W. Hutchison, Positive Economics and Policy Objectives (London: Allen &; Unwin, 1964) 134–6.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Quoted in Ralph W. Hidy, The House of Baring in American Trade and Finance: English Merchant Bankers at Work, 1763–1861 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1949) 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    Mark Blaug, Ricardian Economics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958) 150.Google Scholar
  12. Consult A. W. Coats, ‘The Role of Authority in the Development of British Economics’, The Journal of Law and Economics, VII (October 1964) 88–95.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. G. Checkland, The Rise of Industrial Society in England, 1815–1885 (London: Longmans, 1964) 342.Google Scholar
  14. See also O. MacDonagh, ‘The Nineteenth Century Revolution in Government: a Reappraisal’, The Historical Journal, I (1958) 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    A. Briggs, The Age of Improvement (London: Longmans, 1959) 201.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    For a more comprehensive account, consult M. Blaug, op. cit. Four more recent studies of relevance are: T. Sowell, Classical Economics Reconsidered (Princeton University Press, 1974);Google Scholar
  17. D. P. O’Brien, The Classical Economists (Oxford, 1975);Google Scholar
  18. R. V. Eagly, The Structure of Classical Economic Theory (Oxford, 1974);Google Scholar
  19. M. J. Gootzeit, David Ricardo (Columbia, 1975).Google Scholar
  20. See also A. W. Coats (ed.), The Classical Economists and Economic Policy (London: Methuen, 1971).Google Scholar
  21. D. P. O’Brien, J. R. McCulloch, a Study in Classical Economics (London: Allen &; Unwin, 1970) offers numerous important insights.Google Scholar
  22. See also, Donald Winch (ed), James Mill, Selected Economic Writings (Edinburgh and London: Oliver &; Boyd, 1966).Google Scholar
  23. 19.
    On the politics of reform, consult John Cannon, Parliamentary Reform, 1640–1832 (Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    Arthur J. Taylor, Laissez-faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth-century Britain (London: Macmillan, 1972) 36.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cf. Mark Blaug, op. cit., 69–71. The manner in which revision could upset the simple model is explored in P. D. Groenewegen, ‘Three Notes on Ricardo’s Theory of Value and Distribution’, Australian Economic Papers, 11, 18 (June 1972) 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 28.
    O. St Clair, A Key to Ricardo (London, 1957) 120Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    T. De Quincey, The Logic of Political Economy (Edinburgh and London: 1844) 203, 204.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    J.R. McCulloch, ‘Political Economy’, Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1824) VI, 313–9, and D. Winch, op. cit., 262–3.Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    On this issue see S. Hollander, ‘Ricardo’s Analysis of the Profit Rate, 1813–15’, Economica, n.s. 40 (August 1973) 260–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 41.
    See, e.g., J. R. McCulloch, The Principles of Political Economy (Edinburgh and London: 1849) 217.Google Scholar
  31. 44.
    W. Stark (ed.), Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings, 1 (London: 1952) 121–90.Google Scholar
  32. 45.
    D. Hunte, ‘Of Money’, Economic Writings, ed. E. Rotwein, (London: 1955) 38.Google Scholar
  33. 47.
    M. Dobb, Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith (Cambridge University Press, 1973) 66–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 49.
    On the nature and significance of Ricardo’s methodology consult N. B. De Marchi, ‘The Empirical Content and Longevity of Ricardian Economics’, Economica, 37 (August 1970) 257–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 58.
    Cf. P. V. Mini, Philosophy and Economics (Gainesville, 1974) 89–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Barry Gordon 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry Gordon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations