Saint Thomas Aquinas

  • Barry Gordon


As discussion intensified on problems of economic morality in the early part of the thirteenth century, theologians gradually entered into the field which canon lawyers and medieval Romanists had begun to explore. Their entry served to raise debate to new analytical heights. One of the prominent early contributors was St Albert the Great (1193–1280), a Swabian aristocrat who taught at Paris and Cologne, and who is generally regarded as the founder of the theological tradition associated with the Dominican order. However, it was the work of his pupil St Thomas Aquinas (1225–74) that was to prove definitive and establish a body of systematic thought that continues to exercise a profound influence on many European scholars today. One relatively minor element in that thought was analysis of aspects of economic life.


Economic Analysis Distributive Justice Moral Philosophy Legal Personality Thirteenth Century 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Joseph Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis(N.Y., Oxford University Press, 1959) p. 77.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. T. Worland, Scholasticism and Welfare Economics ( Notre Dame and London, University of Notre Dame Press, 1967 ) pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    A. Gray, The Development of Economic Doctrine (London, Longmans, 1959) p. 46. On Economics as a branch of Moral Philosophy, seeGoogle Scholar
  4. 11.
    See J. T. Noonan, The Scholastic Analysis of Usury (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1957) p. 106Google Scholar
  5. and J. Gilchrist, The Church and Economic Activity in.the Middle Ages (London Macmillan, 1969 ) p. 279.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    H. Johnston, ‘Some Mediaeval Doctrines on Extrinsic Titles to Interest’, in Charles J. O’Neil (ed.), An Etienne Gilson Tribute ( Milwaukee, Marquette University Press, 1959 ) p. 89.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Consult Cardinal Joseph Van Roey, De Jus to auctario ex contractu crediti (Louvain, 1903) pp. 282 ff;Google Scholar
  8. John P. Kelly, Aquinas and Modern Practices of Interest Taking (Brisbane, 1945) pp. 67–8;Google Scholar
  9. B. W. Dempsey, Interest and Usury (Washington, 1943 ) pp. 138–9;Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Hector Estrup, ‘Oresme and Monetary Theory’, The Scandinavian Economic History Review, Vol. XIV, No. 2 (1966) p. 102.Google Scholar
  11. On this subject see also Gabriel le Bras, ‘Conceptions of Economy and Society’, The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. III(1963) pp. 561–62.Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    Leon Walras, Economie politique appliqué (1898) p. 95.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    Op. cit., p. 181. On the intimate relationship that could exist between an exchange transaction and an extension of credit, see Raymond De Roover, The Rise and Decline of the Medici Bank, 1397–1494 ( Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1968 ) pp. 132–5.Google Scholar
  14. 38.
    Consult John W. Baldwin, The Medieval Theories of the Just Price; Romanists, Canonists, and Theologians in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, N.S., Vol. 49, Part 4, 1959) esp. pp. 21–57.Google Scholar
  15. 42.
    S. Hollander, The Economics of Adam Smith(London, Heinemann, 1973) p. 28.Google Scholar
  16. 45.
    See, e.g., Hannah Robie Sewall, The Theory of Value Before Adam Smith (N.Y., Macmillan, 1901) p. 19Google Scholar
  17. and B. W. Dempsey, Hannah Robie Sewall, The Theory of Value Before Adam Smith (N.Y., Macmillan, 1901) p. 19Google Scholar
  18. and B. W. Dempsey, ‘Just Price in a Functional Economy’, American Economic Review (Sep 1935) pp. 471–86.Google Scholar
  19. On this point, see J. J. Spengler, ‘Hierarchy v. Equality: Persisting Conflict’, Kyklos, Vol. XXI (1968) pp. 217–38.Google Scholar
  20. See also Sister M. Jane Frances Ferguson, The Philosophy of Equality (Washington, 1943 ).Google Scholar
  21. 49.
    R. H. Tawney, Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, rev. ed. (N.Y., 1937, reprinted 1952 ) p. 36.Google Scholar
  22. 57.
    On the Roman tradition, see Richard B. Schlatter, Private Property, the History of an Idea (London, Allen and Unwin, 1951) Ch. 2.Google Scholar
  23. 60.
    J.W. Baldwin, op. cit., p. 66. See also Gabriel Le Bras, ‘Conceptions of Economy and Society’, in M. M. Postan and others (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. III (1963) p. 560.Google Scholar
  24. 64.
    Cf., Bernard W. Dempsey, Interest and Usury ( Washington, American Council on Public Affairs, 1943 ) p. 183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Barry Gordon 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry Gordon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations