Human Action and Psychological Research
The continuing philosophical interest in action and the careful analysis to which it and related concepts such as intention are subjected stands in sharp contrast to the almost total absence of even the relevant terms from the psychological literature; when the word action is used it tends to be treated as interchangeable with activity, with behaviour, reaction or response. Are psychologists, in blurring or ignoring distinctions that are regarded as central in the philosophy of psychology, missing something essential, do the methods and the problems of psychology really pass one another by in a fundamental way? In this paper I want to examine this type of stricture in relation to possible psychological contributions towards an elucidation of action.
KeywordsPsychological Research Basic Action Conceptual Scheme Psychological Theory Success Condition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Danto, A. C., ‘Basic Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly (1965).Google Scholar
- Hamlyn, D. W., ‘Causality and Human Behaviour’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1964).Google Scholar
- Kimble, G. A. and Lawrence C. Perlmutter, ‘The Problem of Volition’, Psychological Review, Vol 77 (1970).Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S., ‘Reflections on my Critics’, in Lakatos and Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
- Melden, A. L, ‘Actions’, Philosophical Review, Vol. 65 (1956).Google Scholar
- Mischel, T., ‘Epilogue’, in T. Mischel (Ed.), Human Action (Academic Press, 1969).Google Scholar
- Nagel, T., ‘Physicalism’, in C. V. Borst (Ed.), The Mind/Brain Identity Theory, (Macmillan, 1970).Google Scholar
- Peters, R. S., ‘Motivation, Emotion and the Conceptual Schemes of Common Sense’, in T. Mischel (op. cit).Google Scholar
- Taylor, C., ‘The Explanation of Purposive Behaviour’, in R. Borger and F. Cioffi (Eds.), Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences (Cambridge University Press, 1970)Google Scholar