Abstract
In a recent paper,2 I attempted to rebut arguments of several different kinds put forward by philosophers purporting to show that behaviour cannot be explained in terms of the workings of a physical system, namely, the nervous system and its media. I shall therefore concentrate here on the specific argument that Dreyfus advances to the same effect. His argument has the merit of being comparatively new, but since his main thesis is obscure, it may be best to start with something with which we should all be able to agree.
I am grateful to Dr Keith Oatley for much helpful discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
N. S. Sutherland, ‘Is the brain a physical system?’, in R. Borger and F. Cioffi (Eds.), Explanation in the behavioural sciences (Cambridge University Press, 1970) pp. 97–122.
M. B. Clowes, ‘On seeing things’, Artificial Intelligence, 2, (1971) 76–119.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1974 Royal Institute of Philosophy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sutherland, N.S. (1974). Computer Simulation of Brain Function. In: Brown, S.C. (eds) Philosophy of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02110-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02110-9_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-02112-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-02110-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)