Skip to main content
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

The auditor is a little-known actor with great importance in the American political system. To journalists and political scientists—and thus to much of the population—the auditor arouses far less interest than members of the legislature, heads of administrative agencies, the chief executive and his staff, candidates for public office, and functionaries of the major political parties. Only a small handfull of political science scholarship or auditing has appeared since 1939.1 Among the great functions in the political process, auditing is the least well-known among the scholars who specialize in government and politics. Senator William Proxmire has written about the principal audit unit of the United States government: ‘Few people have heard of the General Accounting Office. Few know what it does. Fewer still know that it is an arm of the United States Congress.’2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Harvey C. Mansfield, The Comptroller General: A Study in the Law and Practice of Financial Administration ( Yale University Press, New Haven, 1939 );

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. L. Normanton, Accountability and Audit of Governments: A Comparative Study ( Praeger, New York, 1966 );

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert E. Brown, The GAO: Untapped Source of Congressional Power ( University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, 1970 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elmer B. Staats, ‘New Problem of Accountability for Federal Programs,’ in Improving Management for More Effective Government: 50th Anniversary Lectures of the United States General Accounting Office (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Comptroller General of the United States, Annual Report 1971 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1972 ) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Woodrow Wilson, Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics ( Meridan Edition, New York, 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Brown, p. vi, and Ralph K. Hvitt, ‘The Outsider in the Senate: An Alternative Role,’ American Political Science Review, lv (Sept. 1961) pp. 566–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a discussion of the development of numerous equal opportunity employment programs leading up to the Philadelphia Plan, written from the perspective of a participant in the Plan’s development see James E. Jones., Jr., ‘The Bugaboo of Employment Quotas,’ Wisconsin Law Review (1970) pp. 341–403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1975 Carnegie Corporation of New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharkansky, I. (1975). The Politics of Auditing. In: Smith, B.L.R. (eds) The New Political Economy: The Public Use of the Private Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02042-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics