An Essay on Aggregation Theory and Practice

  • Edwin Kuh


One perplexing problem in the design of econometric research that remains largely unsolved is how estimation is affected by aggregation. The main purpose of this paper will be to show not only that aggregation gains exist, but how to provide practical estimates of their extent.


Random Coefficient Aggregation Weight Random Coefficient Model Actual Gain Digit Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Adelman, M. A., ‘Comment on the ‘H’ Concentration Measure as a Numbers-Equivalent’, Review of Economics and Statistics, LI (February 1969) 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Boot, J. C. G. and De Wit, G. M., ‘Investment Demand: An Empirical Contribution to the Aggregation Problem’, International Economic Review, X (February 1969) 3–30.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chenery, H., ‘Overcapacity and the Acceleration Principle’, Econometrica, XX (January 1952) 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [3a]
    Dwyer, P. S., ‘Recent Developments in Correlation Technique’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, XXXVII (December 1942) 441–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [4]
    Edwards, E. B. and Orcutt, G. H., ‘Should Aggregation Prior to Estimation be the Rule ?’, Review of Economics and Statistics, XV (November 1969) 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [5]
    Edwards, E. B. and Orcutt, G. H., ‘The Reliability of Statistical Indicators of Forecasting Ability’, unpublished manuscript, September 1969.Google Scholar
  7. [6]
    Fisher, W. D., Clustering and Aggregation in Economics, (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  8. [7]
    Friedman, M., and Meiselman, D., ‘The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States, 1897–1958’, in Stabilization Policies, by E. C. Brown et al. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964).Google Scholar
  9. [8]
    Griliches, Zvi and Grunfeld, Y., ‘Is Aggregation Necessarily Bad ?’, Review of Economics and Statistics, XLII (February 1960) 1–13.Google Scholar
  10. [9]
    Grunfeld, Y., The Determinants of Corporate Investment, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis (Chicago, 1958).Google Scholar
  11. [10]
    Herfindahl, O. C., Three Studies in Mineral Economics, (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  12. [l0a]
    Horst, P., ‘A General Method of Evaluating Multiple Regression Constants’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, xxvii (September 1932) 270–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [11]
    Jorgenson, D. W. and Siebert, C. D., ‘A Comparison of Alternative Theories of Corporate Investment Behavior’, American Economic Review, LAIII (September 1968) 681–712.Google Scholar
  14. [12]
    Klein, L. R., A Textbook of Econometrics, (New York: Harper and Row, 1953).Google Scholar
  15. [13]
    Kloek, T., ‘Note on a Convenient Notation in Multivariate Statistical Analysis and in the Theory of Linear Aggregation’, International Economic Review, II (September 1961) 351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [14]
    Koyck, L. M., Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis, (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1954).Google Scholar
  17. [15]
    Kuh, E., Capital Stock Growth: A Micro-Econometric Approach, (Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1963).Google Scholar
  18. [16]
    Nelson, R. L., Concentration in Manufacturing Industries of the United States, a Midcentury Report, (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
  19. [17]
    Orcutt, G. H., Watts, H. W. and Edwards, E. B., ‘Data Aggregation and Information Loss’, American Economic Review, LVIII (September 1968) 773–87.Google Scholar
  20. [18]
    Rao, C. R., ‘The Theory of Least Squares when the Parameters are Stochastic and Its Application to the Analysis of Growth’, Biometrika, (1965), parts 3 and 4, 447–58.Google Scholar
  21. [19]
    Rubin, H., ‘Note on Random Coefficients in Statistical Inference’, in Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models, ed. T. C. Koopmans. (New York and London: J. Wiley and Sons, 1950).Google Scholar
  22. [20]
    Simon, H. A. and Bonini, C. P., ‘The Size Distribution of Business Firms’, American Economic Review, LVIII (September 1958) 607–17.Google Scholar
  23. [21]
    Standard Statistics Company, Inc., Compustat Information Manual, 1967.Google Scholar
  24. [22]
    Swamy, P. A. V. B., ‘Statistical Inference in Random Coefficient Regression Models Using Panel Data’, S.S.R.I., University of Wisconsin, Systems Formulation Methodology and Policy Workshop Paper 6701, (January 18, 1967), mimeoGoogle Scholar
  25. [23]
    Theil, H., ‘Consistent Aggregation of Micromodels with Random Coefficients’. Chicago, Center for Mathematical Studies in Business and Economy, April 1968. (A more accessible and somewhat more extensive treatment can be found in H. Theil, Principles of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971).Google Scholar
  26. [24]
    Theil, H., Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations, (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1954).Google Scholar
  27. [25]
    Tinbergen, J., Les Cycles économiques aux États-Unis d’Amérique, Vol. II. (Geneva: League of Nations, 1939).Google Scholar
  28. [26]
    Zellner, A., ‘On the Aggregation Problem: A New Approach to a Troublesome Problem’, Unpublished manuscript (October 1966), to appear in a forthcoming volume honouring Gerhard Tintner, edited by Karl Fox.Google Scholar
  29. [27]
    Zellner, A., ‘An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, LVII (June 1962) 348–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Edwin Kuh 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin Kuh
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations