Advertisement

The Derivation of Cardinal Scales from Ordinal Data: An Application of Multidimensional Scaling to Measure Levels of National Development

  • Irma Adelman
  • Cynthia Taft Morris

Abstract

The construction of quantitative measures of national capacity to develop along a broad front is desirable to facilitate investigation of the interactions involved in the development process and to improve the design of development strategies. Broad measures of development capacity provide a better focus than do narrow ones for systematic study of the empirical regularities characterising economic growth and furnish an improved basis for the formulation of comprehensive theories identifying critical interdependencies among economic, social, and political aspects of development. They also facilitate integrated approaches to development planning by making possible quantitative evaluation of the joint impact of social and political as well as economic influences on development.

Keywords

Multidimensional Scaling Socioeconomic Development Ordinal Data Underdeveloped Country Cardinal Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Abelson, R. P. and Tukey, J. W., ‘Efficient Conversion of Nonmetric Information into Metric Information,’ Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Meetings, Social Statistics Section, 1959, 226–230.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Adelman, Irma and Morris, Cynthia T., ‘Performance Criteria for Evaluating Economic Development Potential: An Operational Approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXXII (May 1968), 260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Adelman, Irma and Morris, Cynthia T., Society, Politics and Economic Development, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Banks, Arthur and Textor, Robert, A Cross-Polity Survey, Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Beckerman, W. and Bacon, R., ‘International Comparisons of Income Levels: A Suggested New Measure’, Economic Journal, LXXVI (September 1966), 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bennett, M. K., ‘International Disparities in Consumption Levels’, American Economic Review, XLI (September 1951), 632–649Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cohen, M. R. and NAGEL, E., An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1934.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Coleman, James S., Introduction to Mathematical Sociology, New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Coombs, Clyde H., ‘A Theory of Psychological Scaling’, Engineering Research Bulletin, No. 34. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kruskal, J. B., ‘Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis’, Psychometrica, XXIX (March 1964), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Barton, Allen H.,‘Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices’, The Policy Sciences, edited by Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951, 155–192.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Mcclelland, David C., The Achieving Society.Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Nutter, J. Warren, ‘On Measuring Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, LXV (February 1957), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Pfanzagl, J., Theory of Measurement, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Shepard, R. N., ‘Analysis of Proximities as a Technique for the Study of Information Processing in Man’, Human Factors, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Stevens, S. S., ‘On the Theory of Scales of Measurement’, Philosophy of Science, edited by Arthur Danto and Sidney Morgenbesser. New York: Meridian Books, Inc., 1960, 141–149.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Stone, Richard, The Role of Measurement in EconomicsCambridge, England: The University Press,1951.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Torgerson, Warren S., Theory and Methods of Scaling, New York: John Wiley and Sons,1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Irma Adelman and Cynthia Taft Morris 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irma Adelman
  • Cynthia Taft Morris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations