Skip to main content

The Derivation of Cardinal Scales from Ordinal Data: An Application of Multidimensional Scaling to Measure Levels of National Development

  • Chapter

Abstract

The construction of quantitative measures of national capacity to develop along a broad front is desirable to facilitate investigation of the interactions involved in the development process and to improve the design of development strategies. Broad measures of development capacity provide a better focus than do narrow ones for systematic study of the empirical regularities characterising economic growth and furnish an improved basis for the formulation of comprehensive theories identifying critical interdependencies among economic, social, and political aspects of development. They also facilitate integrated approaches to development planning by making possible quantitative evaluation of the joint impact of social and political as well as economic influences on development.

The authors are at the University of Maryland and The American University respectively. We are indebted to J. B. Kruskal for his invaluable assistance and for the computer program with which the calculations were performed and to F. L. Adelman for his comments. The research in this paper was supported by National Science Foundation grant GS-1689.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. and Tukey, J. W., ‘Efficient Conversion of Nonmetric Information into Metric Information,’ Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Meetings, Social Statistics Section, 1959, 226–230.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adelman, Irma and Morris, Cynthia T., ‘Performance Criteria for Evaluating Economic Development Potential: An Operational Approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXXII (May 1968), 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adelman, Irma and Morris, Cynthia T., Society, Politics and Economic Development, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banks, Arthur and Textor, Robert, A Cross-Polity Survey, Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beckerman, W. and Bacon, R., ‘International Comparisons of Income Levels: A Suggested New Measure’, Economic Journal, LXXVI (September 1966), 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett, M. K., ‘International Disparities in Consumption Levels’, American Economic Review, XLI (September 1951), 632–649

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, M. R. and NAGEL, E., An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman, James S., Introduction to Mathematical Sociology, New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coombs, Clyde H., ‘A Theory of Psychological Scaling’, Engineering Research Bulletin, No. 34. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruskal, J. B., ‘Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis’, Psychometrica, XXIX (March 1964), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Barton, Allen H.,‘Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices’, The Policy Sciences, edited by Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951, 155–192.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mcclelland, David C., The Achieving Society.Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1961.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Nutter, J. Warren, ‘On Measuring Economic Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, LXV (February 1957), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfanzagl, J., Theory of Measurement, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shepard, R. N., ‘Analysis of Proximities as a Technique for the Study of Information Processing in Man’, Human Factors, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stevens, S. S., ‘On the Theory of Scales of Measurement’, Philosophy of Science, edited by Arthur Danto and Sidney Morgenbesser. New York: Meridian Books, Inc., 1960, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stone, Richard, The Role of Measurement in EconomicsCambridge, England: The University Press,1951.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Torgerson, Warren S., Theory and Methods of Scaling, New York: John Wiley and Sons,1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Willy Sellekaerts

Copyright information

© 1974 Irma Adelman and Cynthia Taft Morris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adelman, I., Morris, C.T. (1974). The Derivation of Cardinal Scales from Ordinal Data: An Application of Multidimensional Scaling to Measure Levels of National Development. In: Sellekaerts, W. (eds) Economic Development and Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01933-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics